From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24129 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2014 08:44:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 32854 Received: (qmail 12042 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2014 08:44:39 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7fac6d000006cfe-c2-53bbaf73b82d Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 09:44:34 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: runhelpdir Issues with building Zsh 5.0.5 for Fedora Message-id: <20140708094434.474257a0@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <1404412968.4217.12.camel@hellraiser.hellfire.rockserve.de> References: <1404412968.4217.12.camel@hellraiser.hellfire.rockserve.de> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuplluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Vd3i9buDDfq/SlocbH7I5MDoserg B6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujKlXpjAVtLNWzJqyhLGB8S9zFyMnh4SAicSj7auhbDGJC/fW s3UxcnEICSxllDi1axM7hLOcSWLO1pMsIFUsAqoSPRcnsoHYbAKGElM3zWYEsUUExCXOrj0P ViMs4Chx/v8OsDivgL1E58fdYDangIfE1G3fwLYJCbhLTPu5jQnE5hfQl7j69xMTxBX2EjOv nIHqFZT4Mfke2ExmAS2JzduaWCFseYnNa94yT2AUmIWkbBaSsllIyhYwMq9iFE0tTS4oTkrP NdQrTswtLs1L10vOz93ECAnCLzsYFx+zOsQowMGoxMOrUbs7WIg1say4MvcQowQHs5IIb94K oBBvSmJlVWpRfnxRaU5q8SFGJg5OqQZGXYu/345O7Jo688hO5Ul3fNazmE820jTjDPuUu+nf ARfRHTyy4jcsbX891Z2pmS4898oFPYvkz0pF553vSybdvx4ZtnHFvL+X+BKWXXxY7DxRacvj O94VW+u87SZ22d7iOp/z5GLj0RO27Ewt26aYlB037XWsK+6YGbzWvo5/jduHJSYRJgJNSizF GYmGWsxFxYkAm4FNXSACAAA= On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 20:42:48 +0200 Dominic Hopf wrote: > attached patch is at least necessary to successfully build the latest > Zsh release on Fedora, please have a look at it as it might be useful in > other cases as well or possibly also could be applied upstream. Thanks, this looks obviously sane and I've applied it. > As far as I can see there is happening something weird with the > runhelpdir within the build process I didn't understand into detail but > luckily was able to fix so far. I can well believe this --- it's quite baroque --- but I haven't had a chance to look into it so far. pws