From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-33089-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 23837 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2014 08:38:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 33089
Received: (qmail 17317 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2014 08:38:24 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f156d0000063c7-ca-540581fb314e
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:38:19 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: evaluation depth in prompts
Message-id: <20140902093819.0ba101cd@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <140901140202.ZM14612@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <20140826174029.6478ee3a@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20140826181055.59c99bdc@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20140829171605.7bdac33b@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <140901140202.ZM14612@torch.brasslantern.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuphluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Zd3fjawhBts36FscbH7I5MDoserg
	B6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujPuf17AUPGKvOHR5FnsD41y2LkZODgkBE4m+32eZIGwxiQv3
	1gPFuTiEBJYySnTemAflLGeSOLK5lQWkikVAVeLznq9gNpuAocTUTbMZuxg5OEQEtCXaP4qB
	hIUF9CU+vF4PFuYVsJc4cjAdJMwpYCWxfut/ZoiRtxklzjZcBRvDD1R/9e8nqCPsJWZeOcMI
	YvMKCEr8mHwPrIZZQEti87YmVghbXmLzmrfMExgFZiEpm4WkbBaSsgWMzKsYRVNLkwuKk9Jz
	DfWKE3OLS/PS9ZLzczcxQkLwyw7GxcesDjEKcDAq8fC+WMgcIsSaWFZcmXuIUYKDWUmE90Ui
	a4gQb0piZVVqUX58UWlOavEhRiYOTqkGRrU1y7Y/T9eN2PZs4d28hlMP7vWeZ9Jp7ZH/kS5R
	nc/rtPoC43arbSGhJ26pWpzwmv7ROHO3z/HrQR85uPQ3J1/t5xI9enbh7nOLjvH6xT+89MN6
	IkNqttMTJaMQXe96Zud1V4PCtk9u0ZJ/arbqoKT2mygu5tWXexd37Ppe783grf3BNGHXXiWW
	4oxEQy3mouJEAHhf7R4fAgAA

On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:02:02 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Aug 29,  5:16pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> }
> } In case anyone's still following, here's the original script updated.
> } This now gives reliable tracing of who's calling whom
> 
> Here's a related idea/suggestion which adds indentation to the output
> of _complete_debug.  There's no convenient way to produce ${(%):-%e}
> spaces for arbitrary depths without turning on promptsubst, so this
> generates a bunch of %N(e. .) expressions and glues them together.
> If completion goes more than 20 function calls deep there's probably
> something wrong anyway.

Seems reasonable --- it doesn't remove any of the existing information.
A visual cue for calls should make it a lot clearer.

> I couldn't decide whether to put the indentation after the leading "+"
> or before it.  This has it before.

That makes it easier to strip the spaces if you happen to prefer it
like that.

pws