From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-33227-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 19496 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2014 14:26:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 33227
Received: (qmail 16373 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2014 14:26:30 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f156d0000063c7-5b-5422d4925205
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:26:25 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Surprising parsing result with anonymous functions and for loops
Message-id: <20140924152625.73dfa6d9@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to:
 <CAHYJk3SXb_hgz-abLaoLeU=U-Y0zwm=vHv-o+Oeg6=C3CedjUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHYJk3SXb_hgz-abLaoLeU=U-Y0zwm=vHv-o+Oeg6=C3CedjUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupmluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Fd1JV5RCDF5/FbA42PyQyYHRY9XB
	D0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGVe/vGcuOMhc8eBAD3sD4zOmLkZODgkBE4l7W+6yQthiEhfu
	rWcDsYUEljJKfG6t62LkArKXM0nMubaUBSTBIqAq0fhhIjOIzSZgKDF102xGEFsEKN78/R9Q
	DQeHsICvRN9LUZAwr4C9xOSOq2DlnALBEkd2XGaFmB8gMbttCtgN/AL6Elf/foK6x15i5pUz
	jBC9ghI/Jt8DW8ssoCWxeVsTK4QtL7F5zVvmCYwCs5CUzUJSNgtJ2QJG5lWMoqmlyQXFSem5
	hnrFibnFpXnpesn5uZsYIQH4ZQfj4mNWhxgFOBiVeHgniCuFCLEmlhVX5h5ilOBgVhLhPXoB
	KMSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNafIiRiYNTqoFRfrvhqXA9EU6VsDttoQEWPy7O+/J+hX9qd7Sv/9vI
	7vc/lL7fXb+9+ohqh/T59svsvldOPr3Cc8PlIueJl6/OXUhY/2XV46orGf1flBXjO87mGwe8
	erpmEasr20Tu93M3TBbT60xa/eaS9MEYzZ/Hvu0Tm/3908zLZilfiwOlpmxeuSZ93nkxfyWW
	4oxEQy3mouJEAF2UwmYeAgAA

On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:07:36 +0200
Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't looked at the parsing for the anonymous function stuff, but
> if it's not too hairy to fix, my vote is we drop this easter egg at
> some point.

Unfortunately I think defining functions without braces is part of the
standard, though little used these days.  This would have to be a
special case for anonymous functions, which is less useful.

pws