From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14740 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2014 16:26:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 33335 Received: (qmail 27340 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2014 16:25:59 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f156d0000063c7-26-542d7c946e58 Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:25:54 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: Zsh Hackers' List Subject: Re: zsh 5.0.7 Message-id: <20141002172554.1eff5ce9@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <141002091656.ZM12380@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <20141001203847.2a7c000d@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <20141002165807.0dc13b68@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <141002091656.ZM12380@torch.brasslantern.com> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuphluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Vd0pNbohBs2nWSwONj9kcmD0WHXw A1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxvaWOUwF/SwVk9uvsjUwLmTuYuTkkBAwkVg4fxk7hC0mceHe erYuRi4OIYGljBJrtixmhXCWM0msXXaNDaSKRUBV4v2cZWA2m4ChxNRNsxm7GDk4RAS0Jdo/ ioGEhYEGzX0ymxXE5hWwl5h9o5MFxOYUsJJonzsBzBYSmM8o8fFXLojNL6AvcfXvJyaII+wl Zl45wwjRKyjxY/I9sHpmAS2JzduaWCFseYnNa94yT2AUmIWkbBaSsllIyhYwMq9iFE0tTS4o TkrPNdQrTswtLs1L10vOz93ECAnBLzsYFx+zOsQowMGoxMOb0aATIsSaWFZcmXuIUYKDWUmE Vy9KN0SINyWxsiq1KD++qDQntfgQIxMHp1QDI9/q7Yu2LjcV+d72/bLxpX85X1J2rG1r0zj0 dqImh/ly78VR056kKm47e+/E/Ltn/M5dlAlI+Huk1DJQQnPC80WmNy5eqNuxfl1S+FQu3t1s G0tTUzO2fTpvecE+SSF/+V11oaplW8T/Oi+fu1h1yvmM06xrzaXFVq/MEY+paomS9/pVP3va 14lKLMUZiYZazEXFiQAnAuZHHwIAAA== On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:16:56 -0700 Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Oct 2, 4:58pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: > } > } Source distribution documentation. Does this sound right? > > I'd leave out the word "major" -- we don't know of any exploits, do we? Nothing that would screw you up any more than getting anything else from the environment that you didn't sanitise, I don't think. So it can leave you more open than to the effects of incautious programming. Not sure if that counts. pws