From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-33387-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 1183 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2014 15:32:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 33387
Received: (qmail 6115 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2014 15:32:23 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FAKE_REPLY_C,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:31:54 -0700
From: Danek Duvall <duvall@comfychair.org>
To: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>,
        Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>,
        Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: 5.0.7 uploaded
Message-ID: <20141008153154.GA29795@lorien.comfychair.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Danek Duvall <duvall@comfychair.org>,
	Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>,
	Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>,
	Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>,
	Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <141008082131.ZM20507@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <30157.1412768247@thecus.kiddle.eu>
 <20141008121540.2819b097@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22)

Peter Stephenson wrote:

> Presumably this isn't happening with 5.0.6?  In that case we'll need to
> narrow it down to a change.

I'm pretty certain it didn't happen with 5.0.5 when I tested it; I'll start
narrowing it down.

Oliver Kiddle wrote:

> Which exact version of Solaris and which compiler (including version)
> are you using? Any particular configure options? sparc or x86, 32 or
> 64-bit?
> 
> Have you got it picking up local versions of any libraries such as
> ncurses: either built from source or from something like opencsw.

Solaris 12 development, Solaris Studio 12.3, on x86, 64-bit.  I'll try it
on an 11.2 machine as well, in case there's anything in the OS that might
have caused this.

> Not without more information: the test passes for me on Solaris.

Good to know that, at least, thanks.

Bart Schaefer wrote:

> Any chance you have an /etc/zshenv with e.g. fpath changes that might be
> getting picked up by the test shell?

Nope, no global zshenv.  I've avoided shipping that for reasons just like
this.

Thanks,
Danek