From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9832 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2014 17:12:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 33388 Received: (qmail 1801 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2014 17:12:45 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:12:18 -0700 From: Danek Duvall To: Peter Stephenson , Oliver Kiddle , Bart Schaefer Cc: "Zsh Hackers' List" Subject: Re: 5.0.7 uploaded Message-ID: <20141008171218.GB29795@lorien.comfychair.org> Mail-Followup-To: Danek Duvall , Peter Stephenson , Oliver Kiddle , Bart Schaefer , Zsh Hackers' List References: <141008082131.ZM20507@torch.brasslantern.com> <30157.1412768247@thecus.kiddle.eu> <20141008121540.2819b097@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20141008153154.GA29795@lorien.comfychair.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141008153154.GA29795@lorien.comfychair.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22) On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:31:54AM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: > Peter Stephenson wrote: > > > Presumably this isn't happening with 5.0.6? In that case we'll need to > > narrow it down to a change. > > I'm pretty certain it didn't happen with 5.0.5 when I tested it; I'll start > narrowing it down. Heh. Well, today, I'm not able to reproduce the problem, even though it was reproducing reliably yesterday. Perhaps my machine just needed some beauty rest. If I see it again, I'll see if I can narrow it down to particular changeset and/or Solaris build. Thanks, Danek