From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29001 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2014 09:29:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 33517 Received: (qmail 25082 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2014 09:29:57 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=wVERdDcOAfruUCN/1JjCNvFSjYOJKYqc1CtkAI7EePI=; b=bp2of/6YYu/2lc/VrhPzbqU360n4f6qMLfbnYkFLio7DCIaafAuznAQfyaGGasqXbJ Rj4AI37dFpCqAYAESmzjK4LBD8DCqUFkLf5eN7+9FqkamCFqXEgx2sLb5+sIfXZkUZdV ZQqKaUzcUs+3QRbPZrxwqrwdpeYM9fl/Zpj2EnKjvQ0BZLdc4tMbEy4m5F2ouC4vg+GR 4X0Tl+fHxvgqRFqVK13iGLbI8fU+DPu45kwkFtPlCsHTYlHiytLM8d1DdmNwrWSNe81R uC0ewyiPDutq32lb+f61XfpeP+q8iMoC74DiEWItcYiQqmBCgmv4w2H9diPtlHllUU+J 7oSw== X-Received: by 10.180.102.135 with SMTP id fo7mr11671078wib.79.1414056592034; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 02:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:29:50 +0100 From: Stephane Chazelas To: Bart Schaefer Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [austin-group] Re: clarification on $*/$@ Message-ID: <20141023092950.GB5799@chaz.gmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Bart Schaefer , zsh-workers@zsh.org References: <20141020215420.GB7819@chaz.gmail.com> <54480AFD.9010504@case.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Hi Bart, the discussion is at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.standards.posix.austin.general/9972 where there have been more said about zsh I'm not sure it's very productive to have a separate discussion here, but the austin group list is a subscribers only list, so I suppose CCing zsh-workers wouldn't work well. In any case, my understanding is that zsh (in sh emulation) is POSIX compliant by all interpretations of it (as it's quite unclear) and is the most consistent implementation, so I don't think zsh should change anything in that regard. Cheers, Stephane