From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2231 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2014 10:10:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 33951 Received: (qmail 18715 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2014 10:10:33 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f126d000001e9a-d0-54896b39fa06 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:00:21 +0000 From: Peter Stephenson To: Zsh Hackers' List Subject: Re: interrupt_abort incorporation Message-id: <20141211100021.6acdf859@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <20141210100245.45bc7946@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> References: <20141202155452.647182b4@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <141202084858.ZM31517@torch.brasslantern.com> <20141202172654.30e7d380@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <141204085606.ZM9146@torch.brasslantern.com> <20141204171226.301e9d2c@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <141205002023.ZM19736@torch.brasslantern.com> <20141205145054.655a2f70@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <141205100632.ZM508@torch.brasslantern.com> <20141205181330.2b458b46@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20141205203417.2bc66b7b@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <141206215911.ZM16010@torch.brasslantern.com> <20141207162157.27cf418f@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <141207150140.ZM24076@torch.brasslantern.com> <20141208202717.46678b7d@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <141208204310.ZM5625@torch.brasslantern.com> <20141209112647.3cc9f1d8@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20141210100245.45bc7946@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7qW2Z0hBhfuMlkcbH7I5MDoserg B6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujIv75rMWPGar+HPwLWsD42bWLkYODgkBE4kde0y7GDmBTDGJ C/fWs4HYQgJLGSXONIp1MXIB2UuYJH6+uckC4WxjlJgxbxkTSBWLgKrEoa09LCA2m4ChxNRN sxlBhooIaEu0fxQDCQsLaEksevuaGcTmFbCXONXykBmkhFPAQWLdWieIkffZJCb+28kOUsMv oC9x9e8nJoiD7CVmXjnDCNErKPFj8j2wVcxAMzdva2KFsOUlNq95ywxxtLrEjbu72ScwCs1C 0jILScssJC0LGJlXMYqmliYXFCel5xrqFSfmFpfmpesl5+duYoQE7JcdjIuPWR1iFOBgVOLh FYjtDBFiTSwrrsw9xCjBwawkwmsVARTiTUmsrEotyo8vKs1JLT7EyMTBKdXAyBNdtXFPZuzO VuX+B9Zc7YIMXtkv/ERWPefL3ffrgqDql5fVFyaUpF+x3HhQePW+clvZaR/fzTCWvHZHTFw4 g2l53fy/mSIrNIMdPOsWLq5sDb+sFH9zsbtGzhw7kwV7DES/bGY/qnDYIibBKcUtnDNse3ri 8W2/GiVUjjZ9PXp1z5XmrJKXSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAItJcJDYCAAA= On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:02:45 +0000 Peter Stephenson wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:26:47 +0000 > Peter Stephenson wrote: > > I wonder if we're close to the point where applying this branch > > [interrupt_abort] to the master is reasonable. It doesn't have to be > > 100% right, just good enough that people who use the bleeding edge > > don't fall flat on their faces. > > I'll do this in the next couple of days if no one has anything that > needs fixing immediately. It needs wider testing. Now present: the interrupt_abort branch was rebased onto master and squashed to a single commit, so there's no merge scar and if you want to attempt to revert it for investigation you can do it in one go. I'll leave the interrupt_abort branch lying around for reference for the time being. pws