From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-33973-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 1761 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2014 11:47:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 33973
Received: (qmail 26684 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2014 11:47:11 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f126d000001e9a-23-548eca3a1d00
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:46:57 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Different behaviour of zsh with two input redirections compared to
 all other POSIX shells I have installed
Message-id: <20141215114657.1be3fca4@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <20141215113312.GJ26664@sym.noone.org>
References: <20141215113312.GJ26664@sym.noone.org>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xy7pWp/pCDE432FocbH7I5MDoserg
	B6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujFVn77AU/GGq2PnwAVMD4yamLkZODgkBE4lNF99A2WISF+6t
	Z+ti5OIQEljKKPFjzkRmCGcJk8SdT81QmW2MEm+/HGMDaWERUJW4OXkqM4jNJmAoMXXTbEYQ
	W0RAXOLs2vMsILawQKXEtoNbwOp5Bewl/r1cDmZzChhLvJjZB1YjJGAk8fjhTjCbX0Bf4urf
	T1An2UvMvHKGEaJXUOLH5HtgNcwCWhKbtzWxQtjyEpvXvGWGmKMucePubvYJjEKzkLTMQtIy
	C0nLAkbmVYyiqaXJBcVJ6bmGesWJucWleel6yfm5mxghYftlB+PiY1aHGAU4GJV4eBP29oYI
	sSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuENPdYXIsSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNafIiRiYNTqoGxMsXR0n/fNymxkKm2
	IWzyXzwzO0+tmvRzufhkMb1Vf71OTJNlOX7Yc16Q65oMlrr9r52alBdPEm9y8LpwKyLqyI1b
	7zwXBkitnTM3IV21z+RP4bvE9T+dQ09s2fW90Kq5Z5r2pUgrjsslrb3G8yXKJy7IeXho2V/b
	9xe7A/5VGKYblWRdbCtUYinOSDTUYi4qTgQA+HWMdjkCAAA=

On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:33:14 +0100
Axel Beckert <abe@deuxchevaux.org> wrote:
> Is this expected/wanted zsh behaviour? Is this something we should fix
> in zsh? And if so, should it rather behave like bash or like tcsh? :-)

You'll need to try with "unsetopt multios" before comparing with other
shells.  (I'm not suggesting that necessarily removes all issues...)

pws