From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5788 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 16:55:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 34258 Received: (qmail 7317 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2015 16:55:23 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7fc86d0000066b7-14-54b3fa1ed678 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:45:14 +0000 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Floating point modulus Message-id: <20150112164514.4a906d63@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <150112083557.ZM6487@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <1420807419-9270-1-git-send-email-mikachu@gmail.com> <54B013C5.6090307@eastlink.ca> <54B04A7A.1010402@eastlink.ca> <20150109223028.6e003bff@ntlworld.com> <54B066C5.3010008@eastlink.ca> <54B0D893.4080202@eastlink.ca> <510FB8E2-EA0C-4582-BD31-527E9755F0FB@larryv.me> <54B1ACA3.1050001@eastlink.ca> <150110175849.ZM21774@torch.brasslantern.com> <54B20E23.8090900@eastlink.ca> <150110231017.ZM24021@torch.brasslantern.com> <150111113601.ZM29941@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150111200119.134bfe2d@ntlworld.com> <150111120423.ZM10129@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150111202538.4859dbe0@ntlworld.com> <150111184632.ZM3188@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150112095628.4c6a30d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <150112083557.ZM6487@torch.brasslantern.com> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xy7pyvzaHGHx4bm1xsPkhkwOjx6qD H5gCGKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MrZ/7mEqmMJa8X/HM7YGxj/MXYycHBICJhK3JjyCssUkLtxb zwZiCwksZZR4MkG7i5ELyF7CJPFk+hNWCGcbo8SJNZfZQapYBFQlNk98DNbBJmAoMXXTbEYQ W0RAXOLs2vMsILawgLLE+19TWEFsXgF7ifYrK8BqOAUsJbqmtUMNncAuMf/UE7AifgF9iat/ PzFBnGQvMfPKGUaIZkGJH5PvgQ1lFtCS2LytiRXClpfYvOYtM8TZ6hI37u5mn8AoNAtJyywk LbOQtCxgZF7FKJpamlxQnJSea6RXnJhbXJqXrpecn7uJERK2X3cwLj1mdYhRgINRiYfXUmpz iBBrYllxZe4hRgkOZiUR3g+fgUK8KYmVValF+fFFpTmpxYcYmTg4pRoYb6VeSGGdp/Hc+daG sDnHussXtMVfaShqi3jT/Pa5p9q0rVlW//x6eB/WlT97xVjl2MI07cKedXs+BT78al+7YuFK E3Vp5cMMXzIPnYjyVa5u5dC8x8RzrGczq7XmbGNhn6szLsuXTly6w3zSjV+qDIe/OadOmCoq sfpBY9RtubtnNC7lsTDvVWIpzkg01GIuKk4EAAucdlg5AgAA On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:35:57 -0800 Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Jan 12, 9:56am, Peter Stephenson wrote: > } > } > I had to do this instead: > } > } That's what I was expecting you to do. > > I see you've already done something with this, but just to close the > thread: I thought you were expecting me to do what was done in the > immediately preceding test [ print -- $(( rnd = ... )) ] and was > surprised when it didn't work. Yes, that's the test I noted we (probably I) had screwed up over when I wrote the last patch, so the previous situation was indeed a bit confused. Should all be consistent now. pws