From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-34616-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 10899 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2015 13:58:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 34616
Received: (qmail 28667 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2015 13:58:23 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f126d000001e9a-72-54eb31695a9b
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:58:15 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Remeta one frame earlier
Message-id: <20150223135815.2991a984@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <1424699469-11744-1-git-send-email-mikachu@gmail.com>
References:
 <CAHYJk3RuZiWpi-_ZnEfdS9HHww1OvFj1AegZBiXeMDH0zceieg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1424699469-11744-1-git-send-email-mikachu@gmail.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7qZhq9DDBp38FscbH7I5MDoserg
	B6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujAunNjAWzGGp+H98GVsD43rmLkZODgkBE4llmx4yQdhiEhfu
	rWfrYuTiEBJYyijx5fRyKGcJk8Sha4/ZIZxtjBKLWzaydjFycLAIqErMXi4K0s0mYCgxddNs
	RhBbREBc4uza8ywgtrCAjsT3Of/AtvEK2Eu8e9gPFucUcJI4PeEQ1MwuRonZM56wgiT4BfQl
	rv79BHWSvcTMK2cYIZoFJX5MvgfWzCygJbF5WxMrhC0vsXnNW7AFQgLqEjfu7mafwCg0C0nL
	LCQts5C0LGBkXsUomlqaXFCclJ5rqFecmFtcmpeul5yfu4kRErZfdjAuPmZ1iFGAg1GJh/dB
	2asQIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK8b3RfhwjxpiRWVqUW5ccXleakFh9iZOLglGpgnB3GHPH07Apx
	s88J9/VXhO57c5xH7mZxZ/CHWx66DTZzRJ4z/BRPuDpJl+n+1I+dk94cyni1zH5ByKOMjbd1
	1OuztJYe8i5nCNS79urj67Z2/3l6Zf62i+x1rdTndbSs1P7MPVv6te4d4cvyJjWmPT7S9psX
	GjX9XJPKdDH9y+/JaVaHds05qMRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAP6ZFBQ5AgAA

On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:51:09 +0100
Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
> I realized I generated the last patch on top of yours since I applied it
> with git-am, so here's a proper patch send from git send-mail instead,
> against upstream git master.

Yes, the zle stuff comes near the top, so this should, too.

Looks fine... I can think of alternative memory allocation strategies
(allocate from malloc, free the old buf, and assign the result to the
new buf), but I don't think that's critical for what we need.

pws