From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-34777-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 8610 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2015 18:07:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 34777
Received: (qmail 18404 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2015 18:07:17 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7fc86d0000066b7-65-5512f6f482b2
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:57:06 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Removing aliases from history, 2015 style
Message-id: <20150325175706.06cb1a8f@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <20150325154853.7efc21d0@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
References:
 <CACeGjnXH=Dk6eAv0OEfyT99RC9J=AMiyxL4wT4p_SVS1pLo0+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150319105716.620cd931@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <CACeGjnUxt0fZN2ArpV_8ECVF-_1KTtorO6rb11DzmOkOy3Xp4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150319125351.1e270c2d@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20150320105703.2754b6af@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <150320090420.ZM21908@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20150322183556.1fa0f143@ntlworld.com>
 <150322162235.ZM1728@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20150323213426.21fd79c8@ntlworld.com>
 <20150325154853.7efc21d0@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7pfvgmFGvyfYGJxsPkhkwOjx6qD
	H5gCGKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4Mh7uaWcvWMhecfrfD8YGxtusXYycHBICJhLvns5hhrDFJC7c
	W8/WxcjFISSwlFHi1NpusISQwBImia5XpRCJbYwSs67OYQFJsAioSlz5uocJxGYTMJSYumk2
	YxcjB4eIgLZE+0cxkLCwgK3Egn0LwEp4Bewlvs/cAtbKKeAgMevcR2aImYtYJK68XwSW4BfQ
	l7j69xMTxEX2EjOvnGGEaBaU+DH5HlgNs4CWxOZtTawQtrzE5jVvoQ5Vl7hxdzf7BEahWUha
	ZiFpmYWkZQEj8ypG0dTS5ILipPRcI73ixNzi0rx0veT83E2MkKD9uoNx6TGrQ4wCHIxKPLwR
	SkKhQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR4ex4BhXhTEiurUovy44tKc1KLDzEycXBKNTDe5f6zz6CJWW32
	3XfyXqweYoH/j04qn1RyYVH9yvlpLj8vzmV/rcKTqLH70TO3uwFPvVMfqLEyuHjILjhcJXdA
	4fevJ+vWFNg9ZIkzd5BLzHnFvXWfScP8abeMnD2ObFj/ouHy0hblnd/M5B5W/Ypwm/X71ru7
	PDelkg/OfdfPskXBJ+bQrMpWJZbijERDLeai4kQA5JqarDgCAAA=

On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:48:53 +0000
Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:34:26 +0000
> Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> > Ideally, I think we'd handle not adding
> > the alias text to history the way we've been doing in other cases by
> > checking INP_* flags, which is much less hit and miss.  That ought not
> > to be too difficult, but I haven't really got my mind round the
> > consequences yet.
> 
> Hmm... I typed this in more or less as below (with one subsequent fix to
> testing flags for interaction with !-history) and was expecting it to
> fail horribly, and so far it's failed to fail.  Perhaps my expectations
> were low simply because it's been the old way since 2 million BC.
> 
> I'll try it further.

Well, it's obviously not *that* broken.

I'll push it so that Mikael can fall over the 1 in 1,000,000 corner case
again.

pws