From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-34891-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 4380 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2015 08:45:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 34891
Received: (qmail 1110 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2015 08:45:39 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b7f106d0000013ec-89-552e22272f71
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:35:32 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: question about posixbuiltins
Message-id: <20150415093532.1eb0a3ad@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <150414194311.ZM25360@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <20150412134049.GB2759@localhost.localdomain>
 <CAH+w=7agsP-OrgOU3FUE01fn5J-9apd2V9FgmCpWR1rf12VoNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150414155830.029eb84e@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <150414194311.ZM25360@torch.brasslantern.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xK7rqSnqhBmvOW1kcbH7I5MDoserg
	B6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujPWz9rAV7GGpeLP5P0sD42HmLkZODgkBE4mmnRvYIWwxiQv3
	1rN1MXJxCAksZZRYPWUqG0hCSGAJk8T2Wa4QiW2MEh2NB1lBEiwCqhJbru1gAbHZBAwlpm6a
	zdjFyMEhIqAt0f5RDCQsLKApceD3D7A5vAL2Eq9WPwBr5RSwkjh88RkzxPxnjBL/H/uB2PwC
	+hJX/35igjjIXmLmlTOMEL2CEj8m3wNbxSygJbF5WxMrhC0vsXnNW6g56hI37u5mn8AoNAtJ
	yywkLbOQtCxgZF7FKJpamlxQnJSea6hXnJhbXJqXrpecn7uJERKyX3YwLj5mdYhRgINRiYf3
	Q75OqBBrYllxZe4hRgkOZiUR3gRBvVAh3pTEyqrUovz4otKc1OJDjEwcnFINjHoRu4rYLT4m
	fZhUvmP21f1Zm+J8Q9cEpe7VaDyldCwk2edT3be0zb+6rEVv5WxPYNU0vfvQt/h+KNcWrR3K
	BltMDqgEsWZrxByfnj+9oWHTXoZfFRYN+4680xS4kCdXsDLreOyaxXe7982OFFITXfhHedqD
	H5PfFeSqcuVvK791jumOw9/Ja5RYijMSDbWYi4oTAeeJFjw3AgAA

On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 19:43:10 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Apr 14,  3:58pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> }
> } I can believe it was never working --- the logic is horrifically
> } tortuous.  I've rewritten it to try to make sense of it.
> 
> Does this make it easier or harder to address Jun T's questions in
> workers/34862 and workers/34856 ?

I don't see how it can make it any harder; if they're related it should
be easier.  However, they're not prima facie closely related as the
specialness of exec happens elsewhere.

pws