From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-35187-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 5503 invoked by alias); 18 May 2015 11:40:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 35187
Received: (qmail 24010 invoked from network); 18 May 2015 11:40:45 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79c56d0000012ee-36-5559cfb9cf44
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 12:40:39 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: vim completion problem after workers/35168
Message-id: <20150518124039.0160a3bb@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to:
 <CAJ1KOAhWcNN-F7jXgo0vCc+ioR2d09_f1Np9EWf0TS+rZ-fkkw@mail.gmail.com>
References:
 <CAJ1KOAh9_WHM9WS_NKXFy9Dhqrsupi+xT36euHLq9iaWaZ_oig@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150518115301.0c80918d@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <CAJ1KOAhWcNN-F7jXgo0vCc+ioR2d09_f1Np9EWf0TS+rZ-fkkw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7o7z0eGGjy7YmNxsPkhkwOjx6qD
	H5gCGKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MtY9f8ZY8J29Yt77+WwNjKvYuhg5OSQETCQuft3JDGGLSVy4
	tx4ozsUhJLCUUWLFix2sIAkhgRlMEmfmikEktjFKfLh1GizBIqAqcXfSVjCbTcBQYuqm2Yxd
	jBwcIgLaEu0fxUDCwgLmEivPzmIBsXkF7CWO7J/KCGJzCgRLNN/bxwYx/zyjxM27ZiA2v4C+
	xNW/n5ggDrKXmHnlDCNEr6DEj8n3wOYwC6hLTJq3iBnC1pZ48u4C1J3qEjfu7mafwCg0C0nL
	LCQts5C0LGBkXsUomlqaXFCclJ5rqFecmFtcmpeul5yfu4kRErJfdjAuPmZ1iFGAg1GJh5cj
	IjJUiDWxrLgy9xCjBAezkgjv9n1AId6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zSHCxK4rxzd70PERJITyxJ
	zU5NLUgtgskycXBKNTBqp274M7dwd1Op3bpVez3PNU+8Guh49f/MVt9byh5tjz0acuuv3df3
	v3/wnK/xxAlbTZfdTd67rzqy8WD+OU8pc8cbyzu0HhUe47RM9xPKnpnyiTHy2kKb/aVbVtcs
	vLnmTkNh8alrG4tef1dxv7Nij8SdzfFJ3gXBYpPEwwxsPym1ad3TZJNWYinOSDTUYi4qTgQA
	8pQJT1UCAAA=

On Mon, 18 May 2015 14:22:20 +0300
=C4=B0smail D=C3=B6nmez <ismail@donmez.ws> wrote:
> Unfortunately even after 35184 I get an error:
>=20
> _vim:7: parse error near `)'
>=20
> yeah this time its the right parentheses :)

A slightly closer examination reveals the following...

Yet another annoyance: in the old hack, you got away with having a
pattern beginning with "(" (and containing balanced parentheses)
followed by an unbalanced ")".  Now you don't.  I don't think that's
actually *that* unfair, and looking at the context below it was clearly
just a mistake in this case.

pws

diff --git a/Completion/Unix/Command/_vim b/Completion/Unix/Command/_vim
index 021054d..007671b 100644
--- a/Completion/Unix/Command/_vim
+++ b/Completion/Unix/Command/_vim
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 _vim_files () {
   case $PREFIX in
     (+*) _files -P './' $* && return 0 ;;
-    (scp|http(|s)|(|s)ftp):*) _urls ;;
+    ((scp|http(|s)|(|s)ftp):*) _urls ;;
     (*) _files $* ;;
   esac
   case $PREFIX in