From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-35281-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 16597 invoked by alias); 24 May 2015 12:54:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 35281
Received: (qmail 11184 invoked from network); 24 May 2015 12:54:10 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Originating-IP: [80.3.228.158]
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=RLtOZNW+ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=P+FLVI8RzFchTbbqTxIDRw==:117
 a=P+FLVI8RzFchTbbqTxIDRw==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8
 a=U2F5azriIVhTzXzIUNwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=TX4OEdZ_xHwA:10
 a=k7P0yJJEdNsA:10 a=ZXxKfPuxyQwA:10
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 13:54:05 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>
To: Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Release blocker (was: Re: "{ } always { }" construct and return
 in called functions)
Message-ID: <20150524135405.5b366d10@ntlworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <5561000F.5050703@thequod.de>
References: <CAHfspHmUOgLjnEMtLBBoeU31Z2GKu8uD5MYE4jsogMKbf+ag9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150513155915.71f3daaa@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<CAHYJk3RBn_U_ZTNXWHeBfAJyibspcx1=gMM2OTmXz2cpsrrY2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150522233113.76b13026@ntlworld.com>
	<5561000F.5050703@thequod.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 24 May 2015 00:32:47 +0200
Daniel Hahler <genml+zsh-workers@thequod.de> wrote:
> On 23.05.2015 00:31, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> 
> > This is the last thing I have to look at; is anyone else expecting
> > something to happen?
> 
> For a release?
> 
> I think 35268 (Regression with completion cache) should be considered
> to be a blocker.

Yes, as that's an optimisation it might be best to back it off for now;
then Bart can fix it at leisure.

pws