From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-35325-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 22970 invoked by alias); 29 May 2015 11:13:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 35325
Received: (qmail 28383 invoked from network); 29 May 2015 11:13:39 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79c56d0000012ee-fc-556849dfb4a6
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:13:26 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Performance of _store_cache and _retrieve_cache
Message-id: <20150529121326.16674c4c@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <150528151844.ZM11659@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <54D78CA8.7010802@thequod.de>
 <150208122744.ZM5447@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <13334.1432764608@thecus.kiddle.eu>
 <150528151844.ZM11659@torch.brasslantern.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xy7r3PTNCDc5dV7I42PyQyYHRY9XB
	D0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGf8n72EuaGCu2Pj/H2sD4x6mLkZODgkBE4kZq5eyQdhiEhfu
	rQeyuTiEBJYySrz7+5QRwpnBJLF900ewKiGBbYwSO+/rgdgsAqoSt6YuZgax2QQMJaZumg3U
	wMEhIqAt0f5RDCQsLGAjcWz+O7BlvAL2Ek8OrmUHsTkFrCRuT9jKDDFyHaPE7UU5IDa/gL7E
	1b+foI6zl5h55QwjRK+gxI/J91hAbGYBLYnN25pYIWx5ic1r3kLNUZe4cXc3+wRGoVlIWmYh
	aZmFpGUBI/MqRtHU0uSC4qT0XEO94sTc4tK8dL3k/NxNjJCQ/bKDcfExq0OMAhyMSjy8BtfS
	Q4VYE8uKK3MPMUpwMCuJ8O7SyQgV4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkzjt31/sQIYH0xJLU
	7NTUgtQimCwTB6dUA6PaBW19oA8SLx+9oi4x+8vR8q7/yw7mOr1dci+Yfc72O/L94SUTXk56
	0pJTOi/E6Mo3zpRvOm+Vb03Mn5L53mVXURyD7c1jN9d3nZXjqo3seXjpV5P7nQ7PXtWynHN6
	1xpaZ9pvmXubwWuqcNJf/Rbm7isSUsmHvk/yvZPutPPOsmczpX4nv1ZiKc5INNRiLipOBACS
	XZNgVQIAAA==

On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:18:44 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> So ... this applies on top of ae7dcab5ed1882b6115c9fe3ab7894a8b6a7e9eb but
> not with 899613f5351642c8257401054fef5f25725af172.
> 
> Are we sticking with the reverted version for release, or applying 35310
> atop 34476?

If that fixes the problem, applying them both would be fine.

pws