From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-35362-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 24071 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2015 10:26:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 35362
Received: (qmail 1696 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2015 10:26:16 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	daniel.shahaf.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
	:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=hjFITUD7NnchbGzGhJYwqcrfDqo=; b=tK8/4o
	TJ9kB8n97ODIbwzV1c0qonoI7LQjVMcILtAuTjRPWkh7n7/fIIcnu1QnualYhAHA
	GuNk5JkDxpPVZdn/qSYd69mrUHWxy42PnRhnB0XlkBEYtCkBc7CIdTNZfQuLQ3kk
	v6INcul+l9+Xf5j3M0PUK5ITEQOXdCmcFKnY4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
	:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=hjFITUD7NnchbGzGhJYwqcrfDqo=; b=clxv6
	mm3RiMiaOETSxwIDHxk/PYfmxfj5UR8M72Yjiwhip1pXj9X2oXgY4XaEZqt1ae2I
	ndRfRwBoZ5g3D9IBq6L0MDZ7fbtba9EgTw4wGCTp33Ej4jSiKWcc0pBIS1gY+hJK
	hhPqLQXE47SPZ5or6Inm18zcq52qb0NNAxEX7Q=
X-Sasl-enc: 07WhvEB3kYv2ogwH65x01/TrljVJuYkOn3MoplKojM2d 1433240774
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:26:11 +0000
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com>,
	Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: zsh 5.0.8 available (preliminary announcement)
Message-ID: <20150602102611.GB5169@tarsus.local2>
References: <20150531192334.26a88ef9@ntlworld.com>
 <150531171724.ZM29828@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <CAPKC6oJ0fOEeg1--qpufEYQoxTeUnD8KDNSHV5Sfn7J4EtPYCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20175.1433239580@thecus.kiddle.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20175.1433239580@thecus.kiddle.eu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Oliver Kiddle wrote on Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 12:06:20 +0200:
> Is the -o option to test safe to use in configure? It seems existing
> tests use || and && but the precedence of those wouldn't be right.

I suppose most portable would be a subshell, since the requirements it
places on the 'test' command are minimal:

  +if ( test x$ac_cv_have_dev_ptmx = xyes || test x$ac_cv_func_posix_openpt = xyes ) && \

> -if test x$ac_cv_have_dev_ptmx = xyes && \
> +if test x$ac_cv_have_dev_ptmx = xyes -o x$ac_cv_func_posix_openpt = xyes && \