From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5561 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2015 16:57:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 35457 Received: (qmail 26982 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2015 16:57:38 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Originating-IP: [80.3.228.158] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=YMdiskyx c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=P+FLVI8RzFchTbbqTxIDRw==:117 a=P+FLVI8RzFchTbbqTxIDRw==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=q2GGsy2AAAAA:8 a=VPd2UzukSTTI-sVge5cA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=76OnaUNbHHMA:10 a=WVKq70TzGh0A:10 a=nXdR25ud_k0A:10 Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:52:00 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: smart-insert-last-word bug in zsh 5.0.7 Message-ID: <20150613175200.0de7319f@ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <150612121242.ZM789@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <20150612091627.GA10815@ypig.lip.ens-lyon.fr> <150612121242.ZM789@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 12:12:42 -0700 Bart Schaefer wrote: > Now that we have UNDO_CHANGE_NO, that's probably a better way to track > the state, but maybe someone can find a different problem with that? I suppose you could do both that and cursor position, but using an intervening change seems entirely logical if that becomes the documented way of doing it. pws