From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21714 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2015 17:05:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 35544 Received: (qmail 4786 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2015 17:05:15 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Originating-IP: [80.3.228.158] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=RLtOZNW+ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=P+FLVI8RzFchTbbqTxIDRw==:117 a=P+FLVI8RzFchTbbqTxIDRw==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=q2GGsy2AAAAA:8 a=QQTFrdf5IKl0oJJm_2cA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:05:10 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: "Zsh Hackers' List" Subject: Re: Typeset with array Message-ID: <20150620180510.70192e2b@ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <150619205001.ZM4817@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <5578996E.3080700@thequod.de> <150610191427.ZM30841@torch.brasslantern.com> <5579C247.1060800@thequod.de> <150611183639.ZM32247@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150612094237.338f79d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20150619123930.2688d9e3@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20150619150624.3368cd00@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <150619115454.ZM4290@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150619211616.5232274c@ntlworld.com> <150619090904.ZM4132@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150619213204.4e5eb013@ntlworld.com> <150619205001.ZM4817@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 20:50:01 -0700 Bart Schaefer wrote: > There are a few instances of declarations using foo=`command` and/or > foo=$(command) in the completion code. Arbitrary examples: > > _tla:47: local expl1 expl2 tree_version=`$TLA tree-version` > _rebootin:5:local loader=$(sudo detectloader -q) > > Probably these are expecting single word responses. Yes, this looks to me like hard evidence (as opposed to personal prejudice) in favour of the chnage. pws