From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-36463-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 10266 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2015 08:33:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 36463
Received: (qmail 5679 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2015 08:32:59 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79c56d0000012ee-a4-55f13ddb2ea0
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:22:32 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Multiple as-installed test suite failures under different
 circumstances with 5.1-test-1
Message-id: <20150910092232.74f3ef97@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <20150910073100.GL3721@sym.noone.org>
References: <20150908213644.GD3721@sym.noone.org>
 <CAH+w=7ZsMY4HSv-sPbLQj5U-yqRf3+-MAR63jdrtD=7HcF4AfQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150909092758.261695e2@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20150909110403.GH3721@sym.noone.org> <20150909141027.GI3721@sym.noone.org>
 <20150909153902.06cfe911@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20150910073100.GL3721@sym.noone.org>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7q3bT+GGjxYJG5xsPkhkwOjx6qD
	H5gCGKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MrbuXcNUMJWp4sWaXpYGxtuMXYycHBICJhKdDR1MELaYxIV7
	69m6GLk4hASWMkrc+H2aGcKZwSRxbNsaFghnG6PErpndYO0sAqoS145vYAax2QQMJaZumg0W
	FxEQlzi79jwLiC0skCZx/9QtsDivgL3Ei1fT2EFsTgEjiYk73kCtuwW04ftZVpAEv4C+xNW/
	n6BuspeYeeUMVLOgxI/J98CGMgtoSWze1sQKYctLbF7zFuwIIQF1iRt3d7NPYBSahaRlFpKW
	WUhaFjAyr2IUTS1NLihOSs811CtOzC0uzUvXS87P3cQICdwvOxgXH7M6xCjAwajEw8tx/kOo
	EGtiWXFl7iFGCQ5mJRHetO1AId6UxMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zSHCxK4rxzd70PERJITyxJzU5N
	LUgtgskycXBKNTBO0fPxe7skqtrpdJtuEn+Gyur615trvtiv1V5aeVP/HvuOCLZfjq3L/jmz
	Jh6q0ezdupcje2++u/7fwmK3qsjHQbJW/gWH7kTYJE4q3zzBcNYWlvQ9Z7lPKry0a08sML4i
	dDz++pbHXUsT+YK+r7mebD+Pt5qLq3Amr8fTbSXemQf6RTS/LVJiKc5INNRiLipOBAC7V9wT
	WAIAAA==

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:31:01 +0200
Axel Beckert <abe@deuxchevaux.org> wrote:
> I'm keeping this now in the Debian package as a patch for while unless
> you think it's good enough to be committed upstream anyways.

I've committed it: I can't see a problem with it.

pws