From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-36560-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 4931 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2015 20:01:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 36560
Received: (qmail 8433 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2015 20:01:21 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Originating-IP: [80.3.228.158]
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=P+nH/X0u c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=P+FLVI8RzFchTbbqTxIDRw==:117
 a=P+FLVI8RzFchTbbqTxIDRw==:17 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10
 a=q2GGsy2AAAAA:8 a=TSbVqHtbAAAA:8 a=72-wXNLPDSIuDhEgW2MA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 21:01:18 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: bug with $PWD in /
Message-ID: <20150919210118.6b615df0@ntlworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <150919110800.ZM22888@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <20150916162630.GA6436@chaz.gmail.com>
	<150919110800.ZM22888@torch.brasslantern.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:08:00 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16,  5:26pm, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> } 
> } It looks like zsh has a similar issue as bash as reported at:
> } http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.bash.bugs/24162
> 
> How about this?

I suppose we don't *need* to sanity check for a ".", but I also suppose
"A valid PWD may not contain relative path segments, even within an
absolute path (beginning with '/')" is a reasonable rule.

pws