From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-36588-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 2712 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2015 00:02:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 36588
Received: (qmail 26669 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2015 00:02:55 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud10.udmedia.de; h=
	date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
	:content-type:in-reply-to; s=beta; bh=XgVCh2izwyY4YgH55LbZyRWy74
	xnSoQJAQElvu3S+2o=; b=d3ybHKkFM0qZqgaauJEg6YKECTNDLYCM2CnwCeQUnO
	Qier8JJlOsCH5uQBcX5XlwJiIzfGNg/kvScngpWkwLfGlsHh3ojgf1efp8oGT7cq
	r9vG9oX5vkNozwXofCuzpN4MEENyqtNVSfPjVd4fVVk6fP8KxdSWtYzeelOwPt0+
	E=
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 02:02:50 +0200
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>,
	Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Two issues found with -fsanitize=undefined
Message-ID: <20150922000250.GC8913@x4>
References: <20150917075759.GA24365@x4>
 <20150921201306.0017146b@ntlworld.com>
 <20150921200413.GA8913@x4>
 <20150921212113.74706d86@ntlworld.com>
 <20150921203409.GB8913@x4>
 <CAH+w=7bZCZV_tBdJ_43udtHDYb7EzJBNcWse8dZ=YA=vOtXYZw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAH+w=7bZCZV_tBdJ_43udtHDYb7EzJBNcWse8dZ=YA=vOtXYZw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2015.09.21 at 13:56 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> <markus@trippelsdorf.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Well, only if DEBUG is defined. And as I wrote above the issue doesn't
> > happen at all for -DDEBUG.
> 
> You mean that even without Peter's latest patch(es), the -fsanitize
> checking does not report that a null pointer is being passed in the
> case where -DDEBUG is defined?

No sorry. It was a local setup issue. Please ignore. 
Peter's patch is fine.

-- 
Markus