From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21327 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2015 08:44:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 36776 Received: (qmail 21288 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2015 08:44:48 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f794b6d000001495-0b-5612387abcd4 Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 09:44:39 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Can be a module linked to library to which Zsh isn't linked? Message-id: <20151005094439.060a9b06@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <151004135343.ZM17963@torch.brasslantern.com> References: <151003115520.ZM4622@torch.brasslantern.com> <151004135343.ZM17963@torch.brasslantern.com> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7pVFkJhBk9m6FscbH7I5MDoserg B6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujEkdM1gL+tgrGr/2sjcw3mPtYuTkkBAwkdjy/BkjhC0mceHe erYuRi4OIYGljBIPlh5ihXBmMEm0br/HDOFsZZToW3kNrJ1FQFVi2ryzTCA2m4ChxNRNs8FG iQiIS5xde54FxBYW8JRoeH6ODcTmFbCX2NV7GizOKWAl8f/EdHaIoT8YJXas7mMGSfAL6Etc /fuJCeIme4mZV84wQjQLSvyYfA+smVlAS2LztiZWCFteYvOat2C9QgLqEjfu7mafwCg0C0nL LCQts5C0LGBkXsUomlqaXFCclJ5rpFecmFtcmpeul5yfu4kRErhfdzAuPWZ1iFGAg1GJh/dA vGCYEGtiWXFl7iFGCQ5mJRHeV2ZCYUK8KYmVValF+fFFpTmpxYcYpTlYlMR5Z+56HyIkkJ5Y kpqdmlqQWgSTZeLglGpgbNoU/SIxuVf6jdm3Xs6VzTXeEpYmlRwh/cncvYGRR5jTvsyLDtu8 u7j17qx1+WsYeNM1M8r0RPIXLq5/ZmY3WX7PRUcZnt0ZDtrFuZPfsi3ayxn2Ym70qp3Sc/7d 8PDO/fIs92XN4pOSm6etcnv2bm7MGtE972er9PsfENKqT1M5PnlP9UdBJZbijERDLeai4kQA gAD2wVgCAAA= On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 13:53:43 -0700 Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Oct 4, 6:49pm, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote: > } What bothers me is that someone who builds zsh against termcap or > } terminfo loses curses module. Having a bit of separate tests in > } configure against libraries needed by modules but not zsh itself would > } solve this. Is Zsh open for such change? > > Certainly, we'll take improvements to the configure script. I've also > noticed that it checks more than once for some dependencies; there's > probably a lot that could be done. We've been pretty conservative with terminal libraries because getting it all going on some earlier systems was decidely icky, with lots of order dependencies. That's gradually disappearing into history, but you don't find out how fast until someone complains. I think this would be worth doing now, though. pws