From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-36857-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 183 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2015 13:27:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 36857
Received: (qmail 19769 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2015 13:27:28 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f794b6d000001495-64-561e583da222
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:27:22 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Slowdown around 5.0.5-dev-0
Message-id: <20151014142722.282d0c5a@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <151013085246.ZM30504@torch.brasslantern.com>
References:
 <CAKc7PVDAS+yud1ChCsAMMKqNF=vEPcbN51czm56veKcS3WZxyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKc7PVBBP0NfNwn9AVxqKQyRUcKfSPVC4C-Y2mjEsTo5JHSZyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <151010170623.ZM16166@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <151010232045.ZM12931@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <CAKc7PVD8dU29eyfF-QJPUicFGUT6Kpomu+qZNungwnXpbjCH7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <151011091757.ZM27755@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <CAKc7PVC-zdP=YBEoWYJVSG9aS_MRQXAY-mG0VJW+mbOmOGJZfQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <151011103121.ZM8814@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <CAKc7PVBkSP=RKPACOCcOT8wLJiXisTK3i-Pf0ZKXw-RS7F50WQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <151011142204.ZM9103@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <CAKc7PVBaRhL1BmiPqbhP-9iPC3vzA5NTpHtBJvSXJsMxF_4CDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <151012070105.ZM15099@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <CAKc7PVBGmvRwWABnVd10eZQEn2qZ-ORo6JwoPQaXNzV9sgaOWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <151012173304.ZM15477@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <CAKc7PVDXo=UVqiRJd+eCo1hCFF-Lf79N46tOEL2w6R_8QP+gpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <151013085246.ZM30504@torch.brasslantern.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7q2EXJhBr1fhCwONj9kcmD0WHXw
	A1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxtOO7YwF/5krLi68ytLAOI+5i5GTQ0LAROJQzzp2CFtM4sK9
	9WxdjFwcQgJLGSUOz5/JBOHMYJKY+fEUO4SzjVHi9udzrF2MHBwsAqoSnX3BIN1sAoYSUzfN
	ZgSxRQTEJc6uPc8CYgsLaEj8afrKCmLzCthLvJg0kQ2klVPASqLptRNIWEjgILvE/RfFIDa/
	gL7E1b+fmCAOspeYeeUMI0SroMSPyffARjILaEls3tbECmHLS2xe85YZYo66xI27u9knMArN
	QtIyC0nLLCQtCxiZVzGKppYmFxQnpeca6RUn5haX5qXrJefnbmKEhOzXHYxLj1kdYhTgYFTi
	4T2wVjZMiDWxrLgy9xCjBAezkgjvHwO5MCHelMTKqtSi/Pii0pzU4kOM0hwsSuK8M3e9DxES
	SE8sSc1OTS1ILYLJMnFwSjUw6q44mTE/ieN0p7vz4Q02bjMfCC8w84s39TP8V7lnjS3DkdSm
	ehm5OwclGE70vz7pGLXjTO+ejSxZukcNl1sHVrlvikt7OjPw5C4r63Ld40Xn/3Z9cdseuyfu
	0BOWqzYz3Xaqf2d8qXHrooNyekzx5Pez9055l8X4sDtlYl2Q0xt1t0U5S5T1lFiKMxINtZiL
	ihMBsvFxBlUCAAA=

On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 08:52:46 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> For example, the following shows what I mean.  This may be a poor
> choice if most functions are small, so I won't suggest committing, but
> this is the kind of well-isolated push/pop that might benefit.

I'd suggest a quick finger test with the completion system to see if
anything is obviously worse --- if anything is going to exercise large
function stacks with small-to-medium size functions, it's that.

pws