From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28884 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2015 11:59:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 37183 Received: (qmail 25957 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2015 11:59:57 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Message-ID: <201511221248360141.002B54E3@gateway.core.mpy.ch> In-Reply-To: <20151121183514.527eccf6@ntlworld.com> References: <20151121183514.527eccf6@ntlworld.com> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:48:36 +0100 Reply-To: mpy@gmx.net From: "Manuel Presnitz" To: "Peter Stephenson" Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: zsh 5.1.1-test-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Null-Tag: 914e606f0a732e184038638880b37fd6 I experience problems with this command $ hash -m 'foo' which hangs infinitely (? -- at least a very long time) using= "zsh-5.1.1-test-1-1-gb168830" with no rcfiles loaded (zsh -f). I can observe this behaviour on cygwin-i686 as well as on linux-x86_64= usind my usual configure options: $ ./configure --prefix=3D/usr --enable-multibyte --enable-pcre Disabling pcre does not cure the problem (only tested on linux-x86_64). Unfortunately I wasn't up-to-date the last months with my zsh, so at the= moment I can only say that "zsh-5.0.8-17-ga253ada" does not have this= problem. I can try to narrow it down to a specific patch later that day. ---Manuel. Peter Stephenson hat am 21.11.2015 um 18:35 folgendes geschrieben: > I've upoloaded a test version 5.1.1-test-1 preparatory to releasing > 5.2. You can find it at > > http://www.zsh.org/pub/development/ > > and also as a tag in the repository. > > I'm not expecting unexpected problems, but then logically I can't, so > let me know. > > pws