From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20189 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2015 00:35:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 37274 Received: (qmail 26592 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2015 00:35:24 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=I2DDGMaBGsP8hz+2vnb+9meNewo=; b=y11/si QS2ygemRPKOUZ9vt/SJuzqEocMZfQpHudCeTY6CepRbFrty6kyta3Qwpw3avtSjX 8BfQbdMUA8QppM+Agocww0uFD39XgxyvW3rrmCCSsaVJEQeAwFa3Ynj2r4+CN4U8 2Y5urjUm38JMBDmG0I2PIaLH5JzJNaszLRvIU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=I2DDGMaBGsP8hz+2vnb+9meNewo=; b=q9VNK kYzZ/l2lkl7DwVTmfqyxHPUbpboYILr2w2t8jomX/3u1ywTLs6xXNwrvh7k1N3mY R9KERdXOYwjVpEeKKhD2xR/HLlSMDH9NTjHDQ5jMB7X6NgHAOjlok1TAESeAIDk5 VlDg/8Q1OOKBMn463gIPRB2Hl1aPmHs3BZn5+w= X-Sasl-enc: +hYzqmBkhRZMayxJ57E8hlMR+VTHF7MenHuj+RfsR+K2 1449016520 Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 00:35:18 +0000 From: Daniel Shahaf To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: zsh-workers/37266 has a malicious attachment Message-ID: <20151202003518.GD2462@tarsus.local2> References: <20151201122412.7d355172@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <151201101131.ZM32158@torch.brasslantern.com> <6641449001999@web29j.yandex.ru> <20151202002119.GI6644@sym.noone.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151202002119.GI6644@sym.noone.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Axel Beckert wrote on Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:21:20 +0100: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:33:19PM +0300, ZyX wrote: > > 01.12.2015, 21:12, "Bart Schaefer" : > > > On Dec 1, 12:24pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: > > > Or maybe non-member posts could require approval, as with > > > -announce. > > That's much better. > Apache lists permit posts by non-subscribers but require the first post by a non-subscribed address to be manually approved. (Subsequent posts do not require approval.) I think I only ever saw one false negative there. The only effect to posters is a delay the first time they post. They implement that policy through 'ezmlm-make -+ -m -u'. > > vim* lists uses google groups and moderation for new members and I > > almost never see spam there. > > Nevertheless using Google Groups as a mailing list has tons of other > issues. IMHO it's by far not worth to drop a proper and working ML for > crappy Google Groups. And you don't know how long they will exist. > Just think about Google Wave, Google Reader and all the other nice > services they already closed down. > > Besides the nice X-Seq feature is surely not available on Google > Groups. > +1