From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-37311-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 15822 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2015 18:01:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 37311
Received: (qmail 20677 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2015 18:01:26 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f79b16d000005389-78-5661d4f4ec3f
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 18:01:21 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Single-run while makes script fast
Message-id: <20151204180121.6b2d0ad4@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <151204094331.ZM16171@torch.brasslantern.com>
References:
 <CAKc7PVAoYEZCJvpw-CF5=cbiZSeg3uO8FaJD2Ee6CkL71R+h4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <151204094331.ZM16171@torch.brasslantern.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xK7pfriSGGXw8qWFxsPkhkwOjx6qD
	H5gCGKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4Mr6/m8FScJ2p4satmcwNjFOZuhg5OSQETCSWfVkKZYtJXLi3
	nq2LkYtDSGApo8T6k3egnBlMEk+fzWaGcE4zShyYs4kVwjnDKPHr3XxmkH4WAVWJpat3gdls
	AoYSUzfNZgSxRQS0JHacPAm2Q1hAX6Lp4252EJtXwF5izbGJQHEODk4BK4mWtykQM5sYJaZN
	nA9Www9Uf/XvJ6j77CVmXjnDCNErKPFj8j0WEJsZaP7mbU2sELa8xOY1b8FuEBJQl7hxdzf7
	BEbhWUhaZiFpmYWkZQEj8ypG0dTS5ILipPRcI73ixNzi0rx0veT83E2MkID+uoNx6TGrQ4wC
	HIxKPLwMmxLChFgTy4orcw8xSnAwK4nwMsskhgnxpiRWVqUW5ccXleakFh9ilOZgURLnnbnr
	fYiQQHpiSWp2ampBahFMlomDU6qB8dSfhFWh99kLZlQW7L5hkBWaNCVWz/3Td7UVd5aYF6wz
	jTlQr3J2h4rDj+kL9RVy9F/fUNin2+qx/+6RtVOnz5drPyzbe7RZcdYNh1NpH99f+ub5e+6m
	b1/fcU61jrz/nUvnYVyG79NzT4+9sopfOedM777lch37Pb+d/poolNl3b3u8+I0LweZKLMUZ
	iYZazEXFiQDsfbrWZAIAAA==

On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:43:31 -0800
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> This might indicate that the exec*() routines in Src/loop.c are not
> doing as much as they could to keep memory footprint to its minimum.

You might have thought there ought to be some heap arrangement around
execlist() and/or execpline().

pws