From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25223 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2015 15:13:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 37440 Received: (qmail 21145 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2015 15:12:57 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=83v FaymbLNJdMMuGeE8mbIt41Gg=; b=LSpzbzv9m6Nmri+Re8+3DB7AY0sBuVh9O60 GgGFzd6b0rh2l3m3UUEud7bzdyusMewLSdVOQAdczvxzMuJK9yMT/Wtl525y/JJn 3iy7ldE0rR4mG6AzZJ8167P2WQJYI9VxkWUW37SLlHO1sIZKp3eU04WzB+3BBkOP qxm5/sAc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=83 vFaymbLNJdMMuGeE8mbIt41Gg=; b=YH+YmrDSz2xzqxkxXzebyMwS/RlMffwvPm AdBvzWNPd/MFeL4SzdKBaSqGtb8q8KqwVLHcfX2dPkoEtawn/bEHPmAnc8kM9bZj z1xq1cboprlOX7+HCkk4dTnh24XPjgdKwygwhkeaXuiwjmqnsUCl+aLZq/uiwcFn BwXZn5MrE= X-Sasl-enc: 4YqqEGOou9nTgMx7fQWWNELCMK7UJse+Se2Ayx11NE2N 1451314960 Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 15:02:38 +0000 From: Daniel Shahaf To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: What's the next release number? Message-ID: <20151228150238.GD2010@tarsus.local2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) How can I now, at a given point in time, what will be the next release's version number? I keep running into situations where I need to refer to a change made in master using the release number it's expected to first appear in, and when I try to guess what that number will be, I get it wrong. (E.g., when 5.0.8 was current I wrote "The change will appear in 5.0.9" and there is no such version. Ditto for 5.1.2/5.2.) I could say "the change will appear in the release after 5.2", but that's needlessly complicated: I'd much rather be able to say "The change will appear in release ${foo}" for one specific value of ${foo}. Cheers, Daniel