From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-37702-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 7970 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2016 07:48:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 37702
Received: (qmail 21697 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2016 07:47:57 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 07:47:51 +0000
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@gmail.com>
Cc: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>,
	Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: "drop-in replacement" and transpose-words-match
Message-ID: <20160120074751.GA29602@tarsus.local2>
References: <160111233259.ZM6719@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <CAKc7PVDhxbVgmV7WcGgyDzMmWSjwQ=7=LExXTwr7YvPzPpn2RA@mail.gmail.com>
 <160118223126.ZM28565@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <CAKc7PVB-X+DYVEHRqSoOiDAjNeTsVyz=EN72FHQuF=AnRmh65A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKc7PVB-X+DYVEHRqSoOiDAjNeTsVyz=EN72FHQuF=AnRmh65A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote on Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:28:37 +0100:
> Zsh-syntax-highlighting can be slow, which can be seen by editing ~400
> lines function with zed -f. Maybe it's because it's doing various
> things to compensate not that rich information provided by Zsh.

If you get to the bottom of zsh-syntax-highlighting's slowness on fned
buffers please let me know.  I'm aware of the issue but some quality
time with zprof hasn't produced an actionable diagnosis yet.