From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-37833-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 15862 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2016 09:39:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 37833
Received: (qmail 1880 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2016 09:39:09 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79026d00000418a-77-56ab30dfb5f5
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:29:00 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Error status of "repeat" (was Re: [PATCH] typeset: set $? on
 incidental error)
Message-id: <20160129092900.2b57a4a8@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <20160129091806.GA15826@tarsus.local2>
References: <20160123235300.GC20278@tarsus.local2> <56A445E0.50706@gmx.com>
 <20160126225008.GA4731@tarsus.local2>
 <160126201513.ZM2538@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20160127095212.686e3362@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20160129091806.GA15826@tarsus.local2>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xK7r3DVaHGWxsY7Y42PyQyYHRY9XB
	D0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGR0fbjAV3Get2PBtClMD4wGWLkZODgkBE4mpM7cwQthiEhfu
	rWfrYuTiEBJYyiixasIaRghnBpPEsf6ZzBDOOUaJE8+/sUI4ZxklOta8YwLpZxFQlWjZeZMV
	xGYTMJSYumk22FwRAXGJs2vPg+0TFoiVOL/uPVg9r4C9xLWfF8BqOAWMJRZPPQU1tJFJYsvz
	V2wgCX4BfYmrfz8xQRxoLzHzyhlGiGZBiR+T74ENZRbQkti8rYkVwpaX2LzmLTOILSSgLnHj
	7m72CYzCs5C0zELSMgtJywJG5lWMoqmlyQXFSem5hnrFibnFpXnpesn5uZsYISH9ZQfj4mNW
	hxgFOBiVeHg70leFCbEmlhVX5h5ilOBgVhLhrdNaHSbEm5JYWZValB9fVJqTWnyIUZqDRUmc
	d+6u9yFCAumJJanZqakFqUUwWSYOTqkGRkNZQxdek+b4m4+utriYBe+N0iv5EXY/6Mh82aVX
	IuteyXO7/phU1d/7U3v11MPF8pbs7SeOXfrGFHrgcofPJt6mlBORT4uuM7m1G1fePhqautzy
	5BrNDVv8uit/OT+Wf5nIxuwi+S0iO1I8+c3x/FXNP+RzK2+YrF85Oyra+zrr4bpLhzhUlFiK
	MxINtZiLihMB3WS4YGUCAAA=

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:18:06 +0000
Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Peter Stephenson wrote on Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 09:52:12 +0000:
> > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:15:13 -0800
> > Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> > > On Jan 26, 10:50pm, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > }
> > > } What would you expect "repeat 0+++ (exit 42)" to set $? to?
> 
> I won't say "break", but here are some syntaxes that will now have
> a different meaning:

Yeah, probably stuff people never quite intended to work the way it
actually did, but no guarantees.

> Should we add a NEWS entry for this?

Certainly; it could even be bumped to "incompatibilities" in the README
based on one or two of your examples.

pws