From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-37836-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 28008 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2016 13:01:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 37836
Received: (qmail 4387 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2016 13:01:27 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79026d00000418a-77-56ab62a3f809
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:01:20 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: Silvio Ricardo Cordeiro <silvioricardoc@gmail.com>, zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Zstyle command completion does not work for some executables
Message-id: <20160129130120.04e4cf11@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to:
 <CABq1aV8Wv6bMGoodGCOX=wGmhd6zzJxJR=AZc4eA1JYRr+x4MQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:
 <CABq1aV__gsNumkqqdsnfH2sORfM9SuKo4wAgoE70i9SQ+Xu2pA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160129091907.GC28305@tarsus.local2>
 <CABq1aV8Wv6bMGoodGCOX=wGmhd6zzJxJR=AZc4eA1JYRr+x4MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7qLk1aHGRxcoW1x7vtZdouDzQ+Z
	HJg8ds66y+6x6uAHpgCmKC6blNSczLLUIn27BK6Mt82lBfu4K9a8OsLSwDiTs4uRg0NCwESi
	42V8FyMnkCkmceHeerYuRi4OIYGljBLHZy9lgXAamCQ+LrgIlTnHKPHjZCMjhHOWUeL8l3es
	IP0sAqoSm1Y+ZwGx2QQMJaZums0IYosIeEvsPv6KCcQWFvCU2P7+HjvIal4Be4k1rVogYU6B
	YImuPyehZh5ilPh88ABYPb+AvsTVv5+YIO6zl5h55QzYTF4BQYkfk++B7WIW0JLYvK2JFcKW
	l9i85i0ziC0koC5x4+5u9gmMwrOQtMxC0jILScsCRuZVjKKppckFxUnpuYZ6xYm5xaV56XrJ
	+bmbGCEB/mUH4+JjVocYBTgYlXh4O9JXhQmxJpYVV+YCXczBrCTCW6e1OkyINyWxsiq1KD++
	qDQntfgQozQHi5I479xd70OEBNITS1KzU1MLUotgskwcnFINjMKOy5/IfHpVVxUixx6/RnVy
	dsIqpymPfwetfngy/Jxb4V7NB1MF5iuYX91kvt71TY13m8rSJz/fP5r9LHKvmvicHau0+rya
	nVpZRctd/uc6Z05vWWjlvSaEJ8liR1vN/QeXZ7JPXrjqzT0ZoY1N3303Z86911KSnbS9R3HD
	47kZWgy8V/M88pVYijMSDbWYi4oTAejHFG5sAgAA

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:35:43 -0200
Silvio Ricardo Cordeiro <silvioricardoc@gmail.com> wrote:
> For killall & rake, I get "testing" as a suggestion, as I expected.  For
> the others, nothing happens (they continue trying to complete with
> filenames, the default behavior).

You're missing the point of the "command" style.  Read the docmentation
in Standard Styles in zshcompsys in more detail.  As a summary:

For some commands, as part of the way the completion system gathers
information to complete, it needs to run the command named.  In the case
of killall and rake, it does so to find out what processes killall knows
about or what targets rake knows about.  So if you tell it to run a
different command here it will do so.

For the vast majority of completion contexts, it doesn't need to do
this.  It makes up the completion based on what it's been told the
context is.  It doesn't run an external command for this.

I think what you're trying to do is add completion for a new context (a
specific command) or modify an existing one.  The "command" style has
got nothing at all to do with this.  Instead, you need to start much
deeper in the documentation and learn about how to add new completions
or modify exsting ones.

Oliver's chapters in the book, www.bash2zsh.com, are a good starting
point.

Otherwise, have a glance through

http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Guide/zshguide06.html#l144

and in particular section 6.9.

pws