From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-37892-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 25781 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2016 17:56:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 37892
Received: (qmail 14132 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2016 17:56:35 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79026d00000418a-37-56b4dff3ee15
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 17:46:24 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@gmail.com>,
 Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Should (t)path = array-unique-special work this way
Message-id: <20160205174624.60fd0203@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to:
 <CAKc7PVDXYMJ7EtM-Cii-vAjuBxS9Ch4_xNiqTx-HAqQPeLBJAQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:
 <CAKc7PVCDHQDc=sby5wGNEtWCA6omFhmP8uPWbsPXwTQv9tDqFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <160205091543.ZM29723@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <CAKc7PVDXYMJ7EtM-Cii-vAjuBxS9Ch4_xNiqTx-HAqQPeLBJAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xy7qf728JM2hdx27RuvcAs8XB5odM
	DkweO2fdZfdYdfADUwBTFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAldG6/X/jAU/mSvm/VrP1MA4gbmLkZNDQsBE
	4snMeywQtpjEhXvr2boYuTiEBJYySvSsaWOCcBqYJB43zIfKnGaUePPzJlTmDKPEx+nPwGax
	CKhKNM94zwhiswkYSkzdNBvI5uAQEYiR+HqcAyQsLOAgMePdSSYQm1fAXuLuhflg5ZwCwRKf
	+rZCzTwJNPP5WXaQBL+AvsTVv5+YIO6zl5h55QwjRLOgxI/JEHczC2hJbN7WxAphy0tsXvMW
	7B4hAXWJG3d3s09gFJ6FpGUWkpZZSFoWMDKvYhRNLU0uKE5KzzXUK07MLS7NS9dLzs/dxAgJ
	8i87GBcfszrEKMDBqMTDm7F6c5gQa2JZcWXuIUYJDmYlEV6ug1vChHhTEiurUovy44tKc1KL
	DzFKc7AoifPO3fU+REggPbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cDI07xWRoU3c9XB7/Ev7rt6hS1/dPhp
	YvCE5sVLz5qfSEtYdFR9bputCHPY9TMpn0X4vNUmLDrDXu389uaviRb3LzwOmfCn4uTt+1u+
	bGovvxN2fvvDX8I9QhrrBde/7TjxpfjUsjPeO8yDfn78m7u3Tq/rX+2DuX5zP3TeYndk09Fq
	+eqX+LCtRYmlOCPRUIu5qDgRAEexzChuAgAA

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:34:06 +0100
Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@gmail.com> wrote:
> That was my question. The path has *-unique in type, this could be
> viewed as a guard that no repetition is possible, but the guard is
> avoided by assigning to PATH. That's from one point of view
> unexpected.

It wasn't your question, but you can of course make PATH unique too, and
I suppose an additional lesson is that for least surprises you might
want always to do

typeset -U path PATH

pws