From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-37896-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 14062 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2016 00:28:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 37896
Received: (qmail 22931 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2016 00:28:52 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 00:22:10 +0000
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: emulate -L sh impact on $0, $argv
Message-ID: <20160207002210.GA24068@tarsus.local2>
References: <CAKc7PVDMSiWckCwSijk8i6js86OCNeRuwfkVV1xjGMv_W554_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <7850171454263927@web30j.yandex.ru>
 <CAKc7PVCWzg0n352x9HSzLm9Q4CxBQVvruUb0YbYt2ERVbmCOwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <160131123745.ZM12069@torch.brasslantern.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <160131123745.ZM12069@torch.brasslantern.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

Bart Schaefer wrote on Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:37:45 -0800:
> On Jan 31,  8:13pm, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote:
> }
> } In sh argv[0] is the same as argv[1]? Because again, you say I
> } shouldn't be able to use argv[0] without KSH_ARRAYS, but in the
> } examples, I do
> 
> This is a side-effect KSH_ARRAYS combined with the behavior of
> $argv / $* / $@ when in the "source" command.  Doc of "." command:
> 
>      If any arguments ARG are given, they become the positional
>      parameters; the old positional parameters are restored when the
>      FILE is done executing.
> 
> What's left unsaid there is that if NO arguments are given, then the
> positional parameters REMAIN THOSE OF THE CALLING CONTEXT.  So argv[0]
> in your example is not test_file.sh's $0, it's the "source" FUNCTION's
> $argv[1].

diff --git a/Doc/Zsh/builtins.yo b/Doc/Zsh/builtins.yo
index 542cecf..5aebdef 100644
--- a/Doc/Zsh/builtins.yo
+++ b/Doc/Zsh/builtins.yo
@@ -81,6 +81,10 @@ then commands are read from that file instead of var(file).
 If any arguments var(arg) are given,
 they become the positional parameters; the old positional
 parameters are restored when the var(file) is done executing.
+However, if no arguments are given,
+the positional parameters remain those of the calling context,
+and no restoring is done.
+
 If var(file) was not found the return status is 127; if var(file) was found
 but contained a syntax error the return status is 126; else the return
 status is the exit status of the last command executed.