From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-38055-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 16692 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2016 09:27:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 38055
Received: (qmail 18742 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2016 09:27:55 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79026d00000418a-bb-56d56096d3dd
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 09:27:46 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: ZSH_SCRIPT
Message-id: <20160301092746.1472ae95@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <87lh6384y5.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net>
References: <22221.59800.803540.618862@lwm.klanderman.net>
 <160224143153.ZM28994@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20160225093344.0d2499d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <87r3g08ycp.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net>
 <160225150425.ZM14095@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <87lh6384y5.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7rTEq6GGWzYwGxxsPkhkwOjx6qD
	H5gCGKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MlYcvsRWcJCloufsf+YGxiPMXYycHBICJhJf7/ezQdhiEhfu
	rQeyuTiEBJYySpxa85MZwpnBJNFy5wojhHOaUeLrhZdQzhlGiQc3FrKC9LMIqEqsmD8FbBab
	gKHE1E2zGUFsEQFxibNrz7OA2MJA9sUPM9lBbF4Be4lfr86D1XAKGEhcPLKCHWLoHCaJrxs7
	wQbxC+hLXP37iQniQHuJmVfOMEI0C0r8mHwPbCizgJbE5m1NrBC2vMTmNW/BnhMSUJe4cXc3
	+wRG4VlIWmYhaZmFpGUBI/MqRtHU0uSC4qT0XEO94sTc4tK8dL3k/NxNjJCQ/rKDcfExq0OM
	AhyMSjy8H5ZfCRNiTSwrrsw9xCjBwawkwqsbfzVMiDclsbIqtSg/vqg0J7X4EKM0B4uSOO/c
	Xe9DhATSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLJMHJxSDYwize0nRf+d39t69mf88bOPVxxvepcsnBP/xZItPp57
	vbvGmbaXK7NXe7NWh9hWnFoyccG6f5u0z36/c6krcunrCb2evH3Bq/c7CwfqpkxdxTj1t3X9
	IuGye/vPNRiuNfzOtMDEV2rWM0XWDVXdZTZno+t+P9//5Hb+HPOgbtUGEcl5l/XmqRQpsRRn
	JBpqMRcVJwIAE1GlWmUCAAA=

On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0500
Greg Klanderman <gak@klanderman.net> wrote:
> >>>>> On February 25, 2016 Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Feb 25, 12:59pm, Greg Klanderman wrote:
> > }
> > } Are you saying this is new enough that it can still be changed?
> 
> > That's how I interpret what Peter said, yes.  I don't really have any
> > preference here.
> 
> OK, Peter what do you prefer?

I'm happy with ZSH_SCRIPT only being set for the script and something
else like ZSH_ARGZERO indicating the POSIX $0, if that makes sense.

pws