From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-38058-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 9192 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2016 15:07:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 38058
Received: (qmail 23398 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2016 15:07:13 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79026d00000418a-61-56d5b01e5cba
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:07:07 +0000
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: ZSH_SCRIPT
Message-id: <20160301150707.2ee18f01@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <87fuwa8dpk.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net>
References: <22221.59800.803540.618862@lwm.klanderman.net>
 <160224143153.ZM28994@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20160225093344.0d2499d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <87r3g08ycp.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net>
 <160225150425.ZM14095@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <87lh6384y5.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net>
 <20160301092746.1472ae95@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <87fuwa8dpk.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7pyG66GGTQ/NrI42PyQyYHRY9XB
	D0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGX2PSwpeMFa8ef6OqYFxF2MXIyeHhICJxPUlB1khbDGJC/fW
	s3UxcnEICSxllNi7bTUzhDODSWLO22/sEM5pRokDZ19DZc4wSly/cogNpJ9FQFXiw88WsFls
	AoYSUzfNBtshIiAucXbteRYQWxjIvvhhJjuIzStgL7HhYi8TiM0pYCAxZelzqA0/mCSmnloD
	1swvoC9x9e8nJogD7SVmXjnDCNEsKPFj8j2wocwCWhKbtzWxQtjyEpvXvGUGsYUE1CVu3N3N
	PoFReBaSlllIWmYhaVnAyLyKUTS1NLmgOCk911CvODG3uDQvXS85P3cTIySgv+xgXHzM6hCj
	AAejEg/vh+VXwoRYE8uKK3MPMUpwMCuJ8IqsvxomxJuSWFmVWpQfX1Sak1p8iFGag0VJnHfu
	rvchQgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkmDk6pBsZpbr3ejbXGFyruTg8w/n4n3eOX6qQrQvkBARo79t37
	K3ew+Mj0qEAd5WT3y7OWXAtwLjlaFyj53KXrVH7kk9Lnois6r222sgm+4X79/f6N85secvZ8
	XR7p/nR36v2Km2d8pz5oNmE4tOBZd4rT9Ypp1n2PYiW3r/UUdJ/N9Nb3YvBxXjORX1FKLMUZ
	iYZazEXFiQB3wFOrZAIAAA==

On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:39:19 -0500
Greg Klanderman <gak@klanderman.net> wrote:
> Should we explicitly document that ZSH_SCRIPT is empty rather than
> unset when not invoked as a script?

That would probably be sensible.

pws