From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-38258-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 7760 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2016 19:51:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 38258
Received: (qmail 8536 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2016 19:51:45 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Originating-IP: [82.20.18.64]
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=SOu/L7bH c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=tQ56d2wE10i0ATcm3CvKvA==:117
 a=tQ56d2wE10i0ATcm3CvKvA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10
 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=uzzEmCeQnmaT4IgBZzUA:9
 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 20:51:42 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>
To: zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: short-circuiting glob exclusion operator
Message-ID: <20160409205142.4d23676a@ntlworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHYJk3QzmTj_kWZ+L7MDCnW+=Bmfw6UejROKkWoRjNyWyaLW+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160321183649.4fd4d72a@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<160321155421.ZM27019@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20160322094614.13b07bf4@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<160326084042.ZM12055@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20160407211027.2c305cad@ntlworld.com>
	<160407201830.ZM3747@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20160409192218.3f1d6710@ntlworld.com>
	<CAHYJk3QzmTj_kWZ+L7MDCnW+=Bmfw6UejROKkWoRjNyWyaLW+Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 21:00:36 +0200
Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
> The only argument against this syntax (and I'm not saying it's a
> strong argument) is that you have to choose between being able to
> shortcircuit a subtree, or excluding a particular match that happens
> to be a directory (while still including children of that directory).
> Unless like before this only applies to the final ~ pattern in the,
> er, pattern?

They're not actually in competition; I meant to ensure it was possible
to specify both, which I've done.

pws