From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-38346-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 10076 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2016 09:27:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 38346
Received: (qmail 12909 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2016 09:27:07 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f796c6d000001486-4b-571f3209ed2b
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:16:54 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Possible ZSH bug with IO direction
Message-id: <20160426101654.79938ec2@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1604251059060.6490@ming.fruitbat.org>
References: <571BBF3C.50402@matrix.ai>
 <160423151436.ZM6912@torch.brasslantern.com> <571CFD70.7090506@matrix.ai>
 <160424113558.ZM3564@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1604251026300.6490@ming.fruitbat.org>
 <CAH+w=7a2mRteXctrxr8=Opod2vZdJR3yfVA2LY+d1Azbq4giVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1604251059060.6490@ming.fruitbat.org>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7qcRvLhBvuva1ocbH7I5MDoserg
	B6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujBXbvzAVXGGpeLY9q4HxCHMXIyeHhICJxMUvy5kgbDGJC/fW
	s3UxcnEICSxllJj9dCeUM4NJ4uuJ+ewgVUIC5xglPpxWgkicZZS4emgfG0iCRUBV4tvme2Cj
	2AQMJaZums0IYosIaEnsOHkSLC4soC9x/uUpVhCbV8BeYvqjzWA1nALOElf2boHadotJ4t72
	N2D38QM1XP37Ceo+e4mZV84wQjQLSvyYfI8FxGYGWrB5WxMrhC0vsXnNW2aIS9UlbtzdzT6B
	UXgWkpZZSFpmIWlZwMi8ilE0tTS5oDgpPddQrzgxt7g0L10vOT93EyMknL/sYFx8zOoQowAH
	oxIPr8IyuXAh1sSy4srcQ4wSHMxKIrx6+vLhQrwpiZVVqUX58UWlOanFhxilOViUxHnn7nof
	IiSQnliSmp2aWpBaBJNl4uCUamAsPCGzeJqNxeNZmxUZ63k3Pmo8GlPKb8apcWqfQM2h14rd
	ar8/8uuGCUbcuRn2xT34euqnLJfUlz9umgQUPmc5azblj+vRFc9zReby9lZGXbQ+E/nb8t9b
	93NnFMu5wzgvq396UnU85O/Xl7y1DvuKV0QnLbzfdDBXKTxznbNz/MN7x5bo8f1TYinOSDTU
	Yi4qTgQAozojQmMCAAA=

On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:14:06 -0700
"Peter A. Castro" <doctor@fruitbat.org> wrote:
> So, to sum things up:
>    pre-main hook is bad.
>    CR+LF is evil.
>    Teaching the code to grok CR+LF is hard.
>    Users don't like change and expect things to "just work".
> 
> Am I missing anything?  :-/

Don't think so.

I'd be happy to maintain a git branch to attempt to get some fixes into the
code for CRNL line ending handling as a long-term project, though I'm a
bit busy to contribute right now.  The worst that can happen is we
abandon it and simply waste hours of time...

pws