From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13719 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2016 07:09:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 38902 Received: (qmail 16522 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2016 07:09:31 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(66.111.4.29):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.1544 secs); 21 Jul 2016 07:09:31 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at daniel.shahaf.name does not designate permitted sender hosts) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=hx5MoVFPbJSB8Dov 0InsSAC46cM=; b=R0qjc3lJO8HoaZ2zITkfFNHHF+Xe22PcSCo0buLN+TzQbgrI x33+bLtqkrZPmgf4M/7vbqOWzzLIeA/cxknk9qIczrH1JmI8tusHTMFSVssBp2Ce sfISNPiytl7lVOg+PZ70ASg32Cb2ULcyylDNj9e6093JZrj09BzqVZEZ1Tw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=hx5MoVFPbJSB8Do v0InsSAC46cM=; b=D7J7e/lLlPQDqewxzCRahfbPRBS51diNmWBzAx0Tu4zxDPy ccJK6ji6QxrJb3OKTKdtiO214tDuCnhiDnuOXEIo1OVrhQi029f4l7TOjT8Zxpod UfU4CkScNQ4YTTECtKUt1bBZtH4s3dxqT2INRxKgRJN7zq+w0y+PSBniY76A= X-Sasl-enc: mYAAx0mSH2yGRkuWS8E80qDJW+6QpkO+IcEs7ectyaNb 1469084248 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:57:26 +0000 From: Daniel Shahaf To: Marko Myllynen Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] _virsh (Was: Re: zsh virsh completion) Message-ID: <20160721065726.GD2467@tarsus.local2> References: <8eb6dce0-50d7-5ab2-503a-194c1de2e45d@redhat.com> <20160713045957.GA3893@tarsus.local2> <9968da53-c1fd-fa2a-f30c-c74f884d2478@redhat.com> <20160720065832.GA28939@tarsus.local2> <699166a0-b0f0-452c-2561-b7e3cc952062@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <699166a0-b0f0-452c-2561-b7e3cc952062@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Marko Myllynen wrote on Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:36:36 +0300: > On 2016-07-20 09:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Marko Myllynen wrote on Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 15:06:52 +0300: > >> + _cache_virsh_cmds[$_cache_virsh_cmds[(i)$icmd]]=() > >> + done > >> fi > >> if (( ! $+_cache_virsh_cmdopts )); then > >> typeset -gA _cache_virsh_cmdopts > >> fi > >> _arguments -A "-*" -C -S -s -w \ > > > > Oliver remarked on the -w earlier, are you quite sure it's correct? > > > > -w In combination with -s, allow option stacking even if one > > or more of the options take arguments. For example, if > > -x takes an argument, with no -s, `-xy' is considered as > > a single (unhandled) option; with -s, -xy is an option > > with the argument `y'; with both -s and -w, -xy may be > > the option -x and the option -y with arguments still to > > come. > > > > (-s and -w are options to _arguments, -xy is a word on the command line > > being completed) > > I mentioned that virsh accepts all the following: -r -d 0, -r -d0, -rd > 0, or -rd0. So to me it would seem that -s -w is correct here, right? All these require only -s [without -w]. Does virsh accept «-dr 0» where the 0 is argument to -d [regardless of whether -r takes an argument]? _That_'s what -w is about. Could you suggest how to clarify the man page section I quoted? Cheers, Daniel