From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Re: [PATCH] _add-zle-hook-widget: New completion.
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 06:22:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160722062259.GB3457@tarsus.local2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22468.1469114906@hydra.kiddle.eu>
Oliver Kiddle wrote on Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 17:28:26 +0200:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > This is just a coding style question; there are arguments for both
> > sides. What's the house style for completion functions, to have
> > explicit 'return' statements or not to have them?
> >
> > I'll make the v3 iteration use the house style, whatever it is.
>
> I don't claim to be the arbiter on whatever the house style is.
> Most early completion code was written by Sven and I've tried to
> be consistent with that. Looking over some examples now, he didn't
> appear to use superfluous return statements.
>
> In the end, it is more important to get the return status right,
> however.
I've decided to let PEP 20 be the arbiter and kept the return
statements.
> Furthermore, while checking that this wasn't intentional I noticed
> a couple of functions that use _normal where _default was meant.
_default appears to be undocumented.
Cheers,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-22 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-04 10:40 Next release (5.3) Peter Stephenson
2016-07-04 15:04 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-07-05 6:00 ` Sebastian Gniazdowski
2016-07-05 6:33 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-07-05 8:33 ` Peter Stephenson
2016-07-05 11:48 ` Peter Stephenson
2016-07-05 16:29 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-07-07 2:00 ` Daniel Shahaf
2016-07-13 5:00 ` add-zle-hook-widget " Daniel Shahaf
2016-07-14 0:11 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-07-17 1:51 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-07-17 15:00 ` [PATCH] _add-zle-hook-widget: New completion Daniel Shahaf
2016-07-17 19:21 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-07-17 20:40 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-07-17 21:57 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-07-18 9:47 ` Oliver Kiddle
2016-07-18 15:30 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-07-19 10:30 ` Oliver Kiddle
2016-07-19 17:58 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-07-20 6:54 ` [PATCH v2] " Daniel Shahaf
2016-07-21 15:28 ` Oliver Kiddle
2016-07-22 6:22 ` Daniel Shahaf [this message]
2016-07-22 18:21 ` Bart Schaefer
2016-07-22 18:45 ` Oliver Kiddle
2016-07-23 18:03 ` Daniel Shahaf
2016-07-17 14:59 ` add-zle-hook-widget Re: Next release (5.3) Daniel Shahaf
2016-07-17 18:48 ` Bart Schaefer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160722062259.GB3457@tarsus.local2 \
--to=d.s@daniel.shahaf.name \
--cc=okiddle@yahoo.co.uk \
--cc=zsh-workers@zsh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).