From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-39015-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 16830 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2016 15:23:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 39015
Received: (qmail 18103 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2016 15:23:18 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <p.stephenson@samsung.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(210.118.77.14):SA:0(-0.4/5.0):. 
 Processed in 0.105084 secs); 10 Aug 2016 15:23:18 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: p.stephenson@samsung.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at samsung.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f792a6d000001302-40-57ab44844555
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:13:04 +0100
From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@samsung.com>
To: zsh workers <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: OpenBSD requires special hoops to get correct random numbers
Message-id: <20160810161304.6f53589e@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
In-reply-to:
 <CAHYJk3QOQRPjcuZP+1gu6HKGt5J+e+BEBFN5r5be4NNrjjk8jQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160809201539.25399-1-mikachu@gmail.com>
 <CAHYJk3QOQRPjcuZP+1gu6HKGt5J+e+BEBFN5r5be4NNrjjk8jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker:
 H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7otLqvDDVZ9ELI42PyQyYHRY9XB
	D0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGbsf/WEt6GequHBtHWMD4zXGLkZODgkBE4n/jZ2sELaYxIV7
	69lAbCGBpYwS027XdjFyAdkzmCRurtjHBuGcY5T41LKTEcI5yyhxbf8fJpAWFgFViRO7TrOD
	2GwChhJTN80GWyECFG/+/o8FxBYWCJBYsf83WD2vgL3E5huzweo5BYIl1szoglpdK7Fsw0yw
	Xn4BfYmrfz8xQZxnLzHzyhlGiF5BiR+T74HNZBbQkti8rYkVwpaX2LzmLTPEHHWJG3d3s09g
	FJ6FpGUWkpZZSFoWMDKvYhRNLU0uKE5KzzXSK07MLS7NS9dLzs/dxAgJ5687GJceszrEKMDB
	qMTDu4FpVbgQa2JZcWXuIUYJDmYlEd6fDqvDhXhTEiurUovy44tKc1KLDzFKc7AoifPO3PU+
	REggPbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cBonmYXbbyk1of/0LGrfKuOT51QkjHxuiBDoKmEsPHmeXqM
	+37vVj9xxPRKw/MfXyoWbos48mnvJUNtDumfOzd7CNQK8K4x0vc5qKm9cf3hS25lMy6rHNF/
	1VImVzDV17NwVpLp1SUz+PYbWfQytuv1pmj4dxzPM7gQemG74vxLBx6o7O5vPf5KiaU4I9FQ
	i7moOBEAsaAgOmMCAAA=

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:03:16 +0200
Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
> If someone has an opinion on where to stick the #define or if the two
> call-sites should be explicitly #ifdef'd, let me know.

Looks OK to me, given the nature of the problem.

pws