From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1670 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2016 10:51:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 39031 Received: (qmail 19723 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2016 10:51:57 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(210.118.77.12):SA:0(-0.5/5.0):. Processed in 0.117127 secs); 12 Aug 2016 10:51:57 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: p.stephenson@samsung.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at samsung.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f792a6d000001302-fe-57ada7e9fa2f Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:41:42 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] enable number argument for transpose-words Message-id: <20160812114142.79587341@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-reply-to: <1516997.6itNjt3W91@kdudka-nb> References: <20160801103212.GA24067@localhost.localdomain> <20160812025402.GA5319@localhost.localdomain> <20160812102918.5ad0f649@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <1516997.6itNjt3W91@kdudka-nb> Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xy7ovl68NNzi3gtfiYPNDJgdGj1UH PzAFMEZx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZVw83sJW8JKl4sKp02wNjNeZuxg5OSQETCSmHprACmGLSVy4 t54NxBYSWMooMf1jGYQ9g0niziWHLkYuIPsco8TC7e+YIZyzjBKdSw4zgVSxCKhKfL/XBmaz CRhKTN00mxHEFhEQlzi79jwLiC0sYC+x9fEbsG28QPaXJ6vAruAU0Jb4tfg/1NCDjBIT2qeB DeIX0Je4+vcTE8R59hIzr5xhhGgWlPgx+R7YUGYBLYnN25pYIWx5ic1r3jJDnK0ucePubvYJ jMKzkLTMQtIyC0nLAkbmVYyiqaXJBcVJ6blGesWJucWleel6yfm5mxgh4fx1B+PSY1aHGAU4 GJV4eDlWrAkXYk0sK67MPcQowcGsJMLrv3RtuBBvSmJlVWpRfnxRaU5q8SFGaQ4WJXHembve hwgJpCeWpGanphakFsFkmTg4pRoY1/Y63Z0p1lPJ3L+xlClw04wz5ys/L/51RUnJrWlXuLGo 8FOtWdwpCr+2ZvjO5DWtkC98v/N6jBqrhK9ryNH3FyTrnCInT5xZfnf13s++Hl8fedfOcHO+ aCtwteqD9McE34mLJx1ZxrvKvZDp2wPe2qDCpdsce2Ir2tc+fbfr2Ofp/wvtTeexKLEUZyQa ajEXFScCAPSccEZjAgAA On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:25:55 +0200 Kamil Dudka wrote: > Is the body of 'while (n--)' loop guaranteed to be executed at least once? > > Otherwise p1 and p2 may be used uninitialized by code following after the > loop. It's probably reasonable to do the following... pws diff --git a/Src/Zle/zle_word.c b/Src/Zle/zle_word.c index 2a15171..e4a878e 100644 --- a/Src/Zle/zle_word.c +++ b/Src/Zle/zle_word.c @@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ transposewords(UNUSED(char **args)) if (!p3) return 1; - pt = p3; + p1 = p2 = pt = p3; while (n--) { for (p2 = pt; p2; ) {