From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12249 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2016 00:53:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 40193 Received: (qmail 21864 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2016 00:53:18 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(66.111.4.27):SA:0(-0.7/5.0):. Processed in 1.238668 secs); 15 Dec 2016 00:53:18 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at daniel.shahaf.name does not designate permitted sender hosts) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=e3ceyJGtgpZBsUW 83iJY3xkj1SU=; b=M4GYWqu2SB2ePJblCmvvcMP+AhUZq305SGr7+mQc6SH9rvh NOfBEAHKZvkugd3DrAwJ5WuW7snypen9Y5TnCjYvdmvfFCr+9M1TAcjFOgXIX4MA cA9V0+i6kjuMJH3b7dX4iiZvOSkqCH5Qkwr1OtH6yGS/9LNORe5IjAwMq5gw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=e3ceyJGtgpZBsU W83iJY3xkj1SU=; b=D8BgI5xzRZ3LyGfVCMqIZ37i4KPoEgns4dqr9ChwtHZx4z PDqUt1UymE8O2AZqkbReeUzBbPpbfLQIat1Xz1g+THqvS4Y/4IaQAt0+mZ15jGk3 YezGSYqmAi+e6aK7IzUvk8flwMcrkP9oITMwo34YzdWImGq6Nev6rMCM56b40= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: rfwOg/vg7v0glW/sMznCAMxV+hmiHns2GeGqNgg4xA4O 1481763190 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:50:17 +0000 From: Daniel Shahaf To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: PATCH Re: 5.3: printf - Message-ID: <20161215005017.GA6674@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> References: <20161212234102.GB5457@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <161212202110.ZM19667@torch.brasslantern.com> <161213204815.ZM24665@torch.brasslantern.com> <20161214093922.40d1eec2@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20161214165148.GA16528@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <161214104450.ZM27360@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <161214104450.ZM27360@torch.brasslantern.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Bart Schaefer wrote on Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:44:50 -0800: > On Dec 14, 4:51pm, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > } > } The grandparent patch fixes all the cases given so far in this thread, > } except that "printf --" and "printf -- -" yield an error and "-", > } respectively - whereas in sh mode they should both print "--". > > Bash prints an error and "-" respectively in those two cases as well, > so I think it's unclear what should happen for that in sh mode. I was aiming for POSIX-compliance, not bash-compliance, for sh mode.