From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2040 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2017 22:11:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 40362 Received: (qmail 21562 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2017 22:11:00 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from know-smtprelay-omc-5.server.virginmedia.net by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(80.0.253.69):SA:0(-1.2/5.0):. Processed in 2.069006 secs); 14 Jan 2017 22:11:00 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _smtprelay.virginmedia.com designates 80.0.253.69 as permitted sender) X-Originating-IP: [86.21.219.59] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=CMjXJkfD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=utowdAHh8RITBM/6U1BPxA==:117 a=utowdAHh8RITBM/6U1BPxA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=MWUjAzoEKyAA:10 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=tIFZalLYHhUjnHE-CZ4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=wW_WBVUImv98JQXhvVPZ:22 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 22:10:52 +0000 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: BUG: Zsh crashes Message-ID: <20170114221052.12a4539b@ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20170114203624.2c396d08@ntlworld.com> References: <20170113175242.16210658@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20170114010859.GA22474@tower.spodhuis.org> <20170114024833.GA26958@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <20170114203624.2c396d08@ntlworld.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 20:36:24 +0000 Peter Stephenson wrote: > Removing the "=" after flowgraph stops it ("it" includes any reports of > errors in mem.c, of course). So this points at something to do with how > _values handles values. Can someone else see if this helps? I have a feeling _rust ought to be quoting the "=", too, but that's much more minor. pws diff --git a/Src/Zle/computil.c b/Src/Zle/computil.c index 7bf9535..5b9ceec 100644 --- a/Src/Zle/computil.c +++ b/Src/Zle/computil.c @@ -3569,8 +3569,8 @@ bin_compvalues(char *nam, char **args, UNUSED(Options ops), UNUSED(int func)) Cvval val = cv_get_val(cv_laststate.d, args[1]); if (val && val->arg) { - setsparam(args[2], val->arg->descr); - setsparam(args[3], val->arg->action); + setsparam(args[2], ztrdup(val->arg->descr)); + setsparam(args[3], ztrdup(val->arg->action)); if (args[4]) setsparam(args[4], ztrdup(val->name));