From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26530 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2017 18:31:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 40944 Received: (qmail 18959 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2017 18:31:07 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(66.111.4.25):SA:0(-0.7/5.0):. Processed in 2.818538 secs); 09 Apr 2017 18:31:07 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at daniel.shahaf.name does not designate permitted sender hosts) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Uc63Z2kD0KJktoST5V V6wnPdIWOzNjZmoPazpUyr/6M=; b=MkaCAy0p+FkRV82uhifWbh2h4XgVbrnXIJ gYz02LE8YbrHa4FUG9pJw0oSFHdjCtmlJlXnLLV/IecnspyQi+t6aazEopRdv/ad jSS5Oxvib2k7RFff3WgaqT5xb7tQ0H7i3LX5/WtnaiduOnzBshePhtFvqMiRiUD+ EgGJP0BET2z/eRp0d7W8xtfrgCw4t801xbt77WwK02n/mglwl4iYBFjDx28Q37rN RLb1d+qWr7S9qZyulzCG6SnRxjfi/ybjTAq0fbO1Y2SmMXLkoxjUCcCzjEvEdpHv eOTQHZHjTjvN1yvVXWvEQIvUqxP8TJBFCi0JlNjkg1G+QJej+BJQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Uc63Z2kD0KJktoST5V V6wnPdIWOzNjZmoPazpUyr/6M=; b=hte7SsrHU8YZam6Ph7mCv9Va+BaSuK3HUs sTjJ2FKN0ZsmmYdLJ7vy68578pqhVJI0LjXLyqzntf9RB62RRoqBlUfb3y5lXFlu x7miWfdfig9B070tep5pCQUmbEtaN/sREag5YR0Eos5beimwtJVFThMh2a10hXHL YZ+J1n5c26N5DZ+1FfeesuK6jLKQDycYR/0VdlT8kfV44iW4qruMzO49M179TezV pfdR9DII9zGwMeGH8VdAazLGvSy7rxygBSKR8E2p6m3lQcdsb2zxtYavEokijLsA 1VZvCIm6dmTLqe2+6eN3JcDFKQ0hCUPS3MQUGfbM9VFelAGgM7/w== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: YjnGz9JAQoE+Gy3z+lyQQhdmxASsBxU3BTCrGT+hry6X 1491762656 Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 18:25:24 +0000 From: Daniel Shahaf To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] __git_recent_commits: prefer recent commit objects Message-ID: <20170409182524.GA7780@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> References: <20170409152335.20372-1-genml+zsh-workers@thequod.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170409152335.20372-1-genml+zsh-workers@thequod.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Daniel Hahler wrote on Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 17:23:35 +0200: > RFC: Daniel Shahaf mentioned that `expl=()` might not be right here after all, > so I am waiting for feedback before pushing it. I don't think fixing that needs to block this patch. I suggest that, whether the expl=() is right or not, to go ahead with this patch, since it doesn't make things any worse in that front and does fix your issue; and if the expl=() is wrong, we can fix it in a separate patch.