From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8870 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2017 18:38:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 40945 Received: (qmail 26647 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2017 18:38:59 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(66.111.4.25):SA:0(-0.7/5.0):. Processed in 0.669027 secs); 09 Apr 2017 18:38:59 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at daniel.shahaf.name does not designate permitted sender hosts) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=rArFW4PCggeFvy7F64 o7Lx6QzMiqgJmJnj00cRjurqw=; b=OlOwqiS/d4iCe0LuuJYGAufz5OeEGH5bm3 DhSMN9TEgPRMJaeuiQnk2gvkC7RBakbBXl0doA9XHxj2aguYmqwcLeYu20xrvr6i MtfesDiI3JVhCKiWT0ZE+7dAODl+GzGk0bF9lSllOSl1F1hMMztQMy5YnsSa8jhA LK9DpiXADxJ0MHR/y5MGpKWPMmKlF6a9s4DXNI+Zz9lwmAmlWrxqvMhgzxPG/xlu 4RLwybux0axmpbjYhK9IXz6w+fesF1zoqAx74QbxWKefOkqs+OLhciMevZ3S08OU fboywD9MZmUfDV66k4E2kgr9hgscIuDIa4DmZDZ1VO3q194djG/w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=rArFW4PCggeFvy7F64 o7Lx6QzMiqgJmJnj00cRjurqw=; b=RnXFThns4oQkbKjv0zN7AHDIVsVdI2KKZR ZMDClTMnR0zsNYQNrqgavgcsvspF60bOLZ7oe1cTz/x2vHxD9FEK3B/q/0L6o8tj AsRDCyD9SQWFGtN/8QUkf6EIR7ooAz3EmFVoUNsCib8m1vRI49DT2UTnbj/4iUC8 Gn7604Fhylj6vM5A37MG2xVpiqzyq59clzCw0hcF+JPSr+eDBipRrZgstykjzQlE WPMh4xaZeTzFgTU4VHKZDxvnTbe5wY3cLoBDTQA1jlcO9+rG2Jrlw8Hjkd/kvxLW /Pd780tCr/BnBcpoQYoQ5bupKqIVhHz8hgsCxXzZpreLogBVU74g== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: xHw0DYF04W3Dyvmjsj9oP3VQF2xL/Ga6s18LwNWZNV92 1491763135 Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 18:33:32 +0000 From: Daniel Shahaf To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Optimizations, extra memory of (r) flag (the padding) Message-ID: <20170409183332.GB7780@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote on Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 08:32:33 +0200: > Comparing BSD grep to GNU grep, BSD memmove to glibc memmove says to > me that if there is a cumbersome pitfall somewhere out there, then it > will be on BSD system. So this verification of realloc sanity gains > more strength this way. Could you explain the part about BSD v. GNU pitfalls again? Cheers, Daniel (Don't know why the extra 271-143 MB memory are used in HEAD.)