From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11929 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2017 17:59:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 41614 Received: (qmail 10524 invoked by uid 1010); 28 Aug 2017 17:59:02 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from know-smtprelay-omc-10.server.virginmedia.net by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(80.0.253.74):SA:0(-4.7/5.0):. Processed in 1.800341 secs); 28 Aug 2017 17:59:02 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | X-Originating-IP: [86.21.219.59] X-Authenticated-User: p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=SeoKDalu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=utowdAHh8RITBM/6U1BPxA==:117 a=utowdAHh8RITBM/6U1BPxA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=hrYDcFbpeA1WMHpm1CQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:57:09 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Segfault in paramsubst() from completion (regression from 5.3.1) Message-ID: <20170828185709.59d2f58a@ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20170828005055.ije2rr4d7ovbmfr4@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> References: <20170828005055.ije2rr4d7ovbmfr4@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ntlworld.com; s=meg.feb2017; t=1503943030; bh=+ZVgNpmwRJrPkDyBF3IvoyErJuhkPRAlgKU1alilI9E=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=wgNpcVo30B4tO4fLHbRYgNda/6D70p6lBFhLT8aC4xpLX+60KzEn5H4+vH3gqnY/j MTTXoKOdfJKmGNMtT5ptJvcFoc1Nn2yVSyYe8wO7Tso5c3Hyb//90AfT7t7AgZojBN bNx6tKB7w0zuv34YfAppadA6/aDJzxZsrzfJ8uOo5cf/Dn9gdw/y0UYZAoFGp8iRjo hWtnDIzqg7416lI5/WIjzwcMKvZScJMTZiFP1HBYE9VMla3jUM/g3N5sKytpFnTQQ9 8FpiVbPGadOnoEL4Fznb4BSPlRAmlMIqtsh/MKcClMvdqBmxyIaS56bPESnVTSerX4 gQle35rJ+of6Q== On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:50:55 +0000 Daniel Shahaf wrote: > In 5.3.1 (Debian package) I just get: > > _tags:comptags:36: nesting level too deep > _tags:comptags:60: nesting level too deep > _tags:comptags:67: nesting level too deep That's the same problem. We have no control over whether the system has enough resources that we hit an arbitrary recursion limit before there's a crash. See many, many discussions over the years, including one quite recently, and another not so many months ago. Calling _normal recursively is in some cases sensible, in particular if you've pruned the command line since the first call (c.f. _precommand), so trying to check for a real problem isn't that easy. pws