On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 09:06:37PM -1000, Joey Pabalinas wrote:
> On second thought, doing it this way is probably a *little* bit better; the
> needless initialization of `r` to NULL is avoided, and it also makes the
> purpose of using realloc() over malloc() a *tiny* bit more explicit:

Whoops, sorry about the double send there.

-- 
Joey Pabalinas