From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-42438-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 3858 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2018 14:53:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 42438
Received: (qmail 19417 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Mar 2018 14:53:58 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <stephane.chazelas@gmail.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.128.170):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.064155 secs); 09 Mar 2018 14:53:58 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: stephane.chazelas@gmail.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=zr/l3AWunJvqwFKn3W+mk32r7OghFjIVbagk2/u+jXU=;
        b=QPUg/qk+2ZCLZTVaYRUxvdrrw3LKRTgDWY20RATLkClNJAi/bjiF+VOtx6NnKkGW+1
         ygCZcoVoQYt+mKiJcilPN9afGfHFzx4Z5KYJg7y0JlvnbgPjpt2+6BnOZOJJTuNjxw/4
         S70vvn0lRG64FKemj8BXN1B0SciS9JKGzb5ORe0Tp6HuO2UyBf+AcgkB96m8fd3AiiNu
         09ekc/d6znA7EQhti0aZhhF5FAS9FIinSt+fNgMrtGuzVcSTGo0yhcZLrdJKhpJAXboR
         Dre72t0wCbSuJJD70Ta3/BX8w4aaVJEk4b7Ox9/F9KxTBCEaShFvPI+KUmoveEJYPB2W
         b32g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition
         :in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=zr/l3AWunJvqwFKn3W+mk32r7OghFjIVbagk2/u+jXU=;
        b=MGJZcUlfiuLlrQtBlavd6NyoAs8eYeyuEJLm4JHyCIxKm1BIpSy5ULFt2ppIFO/DOa
         4Wu/C4GmCKBGvmiMmNMA6/NUgbPl24p4gRX5FQs2vd/loxJoUngBIvjzJcFXInGHy9Qk
         uJKdgeOGDbm881dBsKoCG2Tit0FOc0G0wlN2nFm231bEdzgsWlXUPPTdABjIIjlcGhHT
         8IHe78sTEsHbhKSB5EWMLLmo7EO31GQRbnJMik/H2qK4dEPrsER95WBxUJ4GmlF2C/Fq
         Oyj09fayY5BIvJDTgOoi0QuDm9rryJ2OjDqV+FQtpzjoA0KF6QSmFLZSOocYYybirY+y
         Ba/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCSc/FM0KYhyUBI0dRZJhfwh7q3bulBzj6pm1a/E9TVf3DenGNe
	SxKlvkA+Jy/7pfmSHWYVdp8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELutviW5GMGFCEgRzWKz13+r3aFGvv8LsMPpPU7QABv85POn2ccY3rcBwxGLf+vPZa/c0+ISAw==
X-Received: by 10.223.158.196 with SMTP id b4mr25484425wrf.112.1520607233917;
        Fri, 09 Mar 2018 06:53:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:53:52 +0000
From: Stephane Chazelas <stephane.chazelas@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Gniazdowski <psprint@zdharma.org>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Performance tests of quoting and dequoting, printf -v turned out
 slow
Message-ID: <20180309145352.GB20986@chaz.gmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Sebastian Gniazdowski <psprint@zdharma.org>,
	Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
References: <etPan.5aa22836.70671812.159ee@zdharma.org>
 <etPan.5aa28b1e.77e79f33.159ee@AirmailxGenerated.am>
 <etPan.5aa28e7e.6288ff7f.159ee@zdharma.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <etPan.5aa28e7e.6288ff7f.159ee@zdharma.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

2018-03-09 14:39:10 +0100, Sebastian Gniazdowski:
[...]
> 5.3.1, I looked also at 5.4.2 and the results were the same.
> For your snippets I get the same results as you. If I source
> short.zsh, I again get ~25 sec time. I will find some time to
> narrow this shortly.
[...]

Maybe a heavy (that forks for instance) "DEBUG" trap?

or a wrapper function around "printf"?

-- 
Stephane