From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-42486-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 635 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2018 05:14:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 42486
Received: (qmail 14950 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Mar 2018 05:14:52 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-pg0-f41.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <joeypabalinas@gmail.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(74.125.83.41):SA:0(0.9/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.129431 secs); 20 Mar 2018 05:14:52 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FSL_HELO_FAKE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,
	T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: joeypabalinas@gmail.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |signature.asc|
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=RTbMb0Mkd0QQy2mXI9T7kQUpkkBsLFk3a8H5EJRbShY=;
        b=U7v4kvSd4utAqBvuvmfPm/hyEGIcvrJ07jcW9rQ/G4JtmMttFOPY1bzXvcUSF+3k4W
         iygRx9kBydk4P80FSgO8kb6BiOoPRW7SVZTM+QuPRjVn7MwLw97C4lZ+snzsqWOayZNo
         QRf+wvootNAguin8x9X9mUbv5sgjxgKYTvSAbC/ge7XkugXouv6xtMe8Da+dN5P9zAv9
         GqG7W1J4UMHtYjS/EXEJFQ3BDSA64D+0Hecsl4nDNKyTx/AlyBb2PFKxTlW9mvWdKmh8
         vPZb6HwFxuF8nEM032g4P7aUerQglOmiLY4MRa+a797wKecMqzvwnyai3qFvyPx/mGxe
         paQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references
         :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=RTbMb0Mkd0QQy2mXI9T7kQUpkkBsLFk3a8H5EJRbShY=;
        b=ncN5XKqSVPh/J0YWwn01gFlYBZipde25BlZ9TVJTEOyXQyMJRbYn/C8H4brVmwsP3H
         gEtFiEuhqBXFVL9UVcFTo/8RcNf4krPt4A0j4Ndo/vEOzavqBamk9I0G8Iv/3TVeibwS
         TqOWN3b7uFohtPs+7/MvOFaeW5lM2Nh5R0Dtj+AoP09PnxAY6lhxexgxPWcLqYO1c5p6
         PyIerKNgKxsdwwdO/1GRwcklFXF3qezQsJFBp05b5/Bhyt3kyMuOWim4i7ax650Nk9J7
         sqNZgTwg+qO3V/922uf+1iJZ7+hIgRoj3hXyHxGOQGIbbic6A7XFkDmumQvpP38ZTUZc
         dE8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EIFrOSR+1HmO/lgnFkO5ztPpT99SYkmA93+3RoDve31DtfutND
	Gs9JJrZZspkuNk9fn0b4LBk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvo/g9v1MBxDpEPyN4LxruHyXnyuFdsQo1E22snEWnrG7JE7h4pjVNnKxOFKEcAjPOLBLr8tw==
X-Received: by 10.101.93.138 with SMTP id f10mr11038125pgt.255.1521522888839;
        Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:14:45 -1000
From: Joey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Gniazdowski <psprint@zdharma.org>
Cc: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>,
	"zsh-workers@zsh.org" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Why sourcing a file is not faster than doing a loop with eval,
 zle -N
Message-ID: <20180320051445.unbigxxbz6lv3ryh@gmail.com>
References: <20171223221910.vmob22b7uosan5os@nibbler.alyptik.lan>
 <7096.1521281564@thecus>
 <20180319090738.hyri7bnr5siowjuk@gmail.com>
 <etPan.5aafc808.7ce5f63c.159ee@zdharma.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3gthhnimuxdijo5m"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <etPan.5aafc808.7ce5f63c.159ee@zdharma.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223

--3gthhnimuxdijo5m
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:24:08PM +0100, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote:
> So in general all this would mean that getline doesn't provide
> performance gains comparing to current HEAD?

The memory allocation that getline() does seems to slow it down
considerably; in some cases the original was actually faster.

My other guess is that since fgetc()/getc() is very common
compilers spend a lot of effort doing special optimizations for
it, versus getline() which isn't used anywhere near as much.

--=20
Cheers,
Joey Pabalinas

--3gthhnimuxdijo5m
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=n5oV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3gthhnimuxdijo5m--