On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:32:58AM +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> For future reference, a->node.nam could also have been "foo=bar", which
> is not a useful value (assignments have precedence over aliases) but would
> be misserialized by the patch as written.

Aha, I had completely overlooked that case! Good to note, thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Joey Pabalinas